mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unveil Sources of Uncertainty: Feature Contribution to Conformal Prediction Intervals

arXiv 2505.13118 ↗First posted 19 May 2025cs.AI cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cooperative game theory methods, notably Shapley values, have significantly enhanced machine learning (ML) interpretability. However, existing explainable AI (XAI) frameworks mainly attribute average model predictions, overlooking predictive uncertainty. This work addresses that gap by proposing a novel, model-agnostic uncertainty attribution (UA) method grounded in conformal prediction (CP). By defining cooperative games where CP interval properties-such as width and bounds-serve as value functions, we systematically attribute predictive uncertainty to input features. Extending beyond the traditional Shapley values, we use the richer class of Harsanyi allocations, and in particular the proportional Shapley values, which distribute attribution proportionally to feature importance. We propose a Monte Carlo approximation method with robust statistical guarantees to address computational feasibility, significantly improving runtime efficiency. Our comprehensive experiments on synthetic benchmarks and real-world datasets demonstrate the practical utility and interpretative depth of our approach. By combining cooperative game theory and conformal prediction, we offer a rigorous, flexible toolkit for understanding and communicating predictive uncertainty in high-stakes ML applications.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.

Builds on

29 of 76 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  3. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  4. 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 668
  5. 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 629
  6. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
  7. 2018Learning to Explain: An Information-Theoretic Perspective on Model Interpretationcited by 248
  8. 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
  9. 2021FastSHAP: Real-Time Shapley Value Estimationcited by 125
  10. 2020Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex Modelscited by 107
  11. 2020Getting a CLUE: A Method for Explaining Uncertainty Estimatescited by 92
  12. 2021Look at the Variance! Efficient Black-box Explanations with Sobol-based Sensitivity Analysiscited by 65
17 more
  1. 2024shapiq: Shapley Interactions for Machine Learningcited by 43
  2. 2023Explaining Predictive Uncertainty with Information Theoretic Shapley Valuescited by 36
  3. 2021RKHS-SHAP: Shapley Values for Kernel Methodscited by 30
  4. 2024Boosted Conformal Prediction Intervalscited by 27
  5. 2021Diverse, Global and Amortised Counterfactual Explanations for Uncertainty Estimatescited by 19
  6. 2023Calibrated Explanations: with Uncertainty Information and Counterfactualscited by 16
  7. 2024Navigating the Maze of Explainable AI: A Systematic Approach to Evaluating Methods and Metricscited by 16
  8. 2023Don't be fooled: label leakage in explanation methods and the importance of their quantitative evaluationcited by 11
  9. 2023Quantifying and Explaining Machine Learning Uncertainty in Predictive Process Monitoring: An Operations Research Perspectivecited by 10
  10. 2024Explaining Predictive Uncertainty by Exposing Second-Order Effectscited by 10
  11. 2024Uncertainty quantification for probabilistic machine learning in earth observation using conformal predictioncited by 9
  12. 2021Attribution of Predictive Uncertainties in Classification Modelscited by 8
  13. 2022Proportional marginal effects for global sensitivity analysiscited by 5
  14. 2024Why You Should Not Trust Interpretations in Machine Learning: Adversarial Attacks on Partial Dependence Plotscited by 5
  15. 2022Quantile-constrained Wasserstein projections for robust interpretability of numerical and machine learning modelscited by 4
  16. 2023Approximating Score-based Explanation Techniques Using Conformal Regressioncited by 4
  17. 2023Identifying Drivers of Predictive Aleatoric Uncertaintycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.