mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Do Not Trust Additive Explanations

arXiv 1903.11420 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)has received a great deal of attention recently. Explainability is being presented as a remedy for the distrust of complex and opaque models. Model agnostic methods such as LIME, SHAP, or Break Down promise instance-level interpretability for any complex machine learning model. But how faithful are these additive explanations? Can we rely on additive explanations for non-additive models? In this paper, we (1) examine the behavior of the most popular instance-level explanations under the presence of interactions, (2) introduce a new method that detects interactions for instance-level explanations, (3) perform a large scale benchmark to see how frequently additive explanations may be misleading.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

16 papers.

Sort: