mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of Explainability for Multivariate Time Series

arXiv 2104.04075 ↗First posted 6 Apr 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning-based systems are rapidly gaining popularity and in-line with that there has been a huge research surge in the field of explainability to ensure that machine learning models are reliable, fair, and can be held liable for their decision-making process. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods are typically deployed to debug black-box machine learning models but in comparison to tabular, text, and image data, explainability in time series is still relatively unexplored. The aim of this study was to achieve and evaluate model agnostic explainability in a time series forecasting problem. This work focused on proving a solution for a digital consultancy company aiming to find a data-driven approach in order to understand the effect of their sales related activities on the sales deals closed. The solution involved framing the problem as a time series forecasting problem to predict the sales deals and the explainability was achieved using two novel model agnostic explainability techniques, Local explainable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) which were evaluated using human evaluation of explainability. The results clearly indicate that the explanations produced by LIME and SHAP greatly helped lay humans in understanding the predictions made by the machine learning model. The presented work can easily be extended to any time

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2021.

Builds on

9 of 31 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  4. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  5. 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
  6. 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 189
  7. 2018Temporal Pattern Attention for Multivariate Time Series Forecastingcited by 125
  8. 2019Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of XAI Methods on Time Seriescited by 67
  9. 2020Human Evaluation of Interpretability: The Case of AI-Generated Music Knowledgecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 1.

9 papers.