RPS: Information Elicitation with Reinforcement Prompt Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in dialogue generation and reasoning, yet their effectiveness in eliciting user-known but concealed information in open-ended conversations remains limited. In many interactive AI applications, such as personal assistants, tutoring systems, and legal or clinical support, users often withhold sensitive or uncertain information due to privacy concerns, ambiguity, or social hesitation. This makes it challenging for LLMs to gather complete and contextually relevant inputs. In this work, we define the problem of information elicitation in open-ended dialogue settings and propose Reinforcement Prompt Selection (RPS), a lightweight reinforcement learning framework that formulates prompt selection as a sequential decision-making problem. To analyze this problem in a controlled setting, we design a synthetic experiment, where a reinforcement learning agent outperforms a random query baseline, illustrating the potential of policy-based approaches for adaptive information elicitation. Building on this insight, RPS learns a policy over a pool of prompts to adaptively elicit concealed or incompletely expressed information from users through dialogue. We also introduce IELegal, a new benchmark dataset constructed from real legal case documents, which simulates dialogue-based information elicitation tasks aimed at uncovering case-relevant facts. In this setting, RPS outperforms static prompt baselines, demonstrating the effectiveness of adaptive prompt selection for eliciting critical information in LLM-driven dialogue systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.
Builds on
21 of 39 references.
References · 21
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
- 2022RLPrompt: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts with Reinforcement Learningcited by 366
- 2018CAIL2018: A Large-Scale Legal Dataset for Judgment Predictioncited by 170
- 2024MediQ: Question-Asking LLMs and a Benchmark for Reliable Interactive Clinical Reasoningcited by 154
- 2022GrIPS: Gradient-free, Edit-based Instruction Search for Prompting Large Language Modelscited by 127
- 2023Chatlaw: A Multi-Agent Legal Assistant based on a Role-Aligned Mixture-of-Experts Architecturecited by 122
- 2024FinCon: A Synthesized LLM Multi-Agent System with Conceptual Verbal Reinforcement for Enhanced Financial Decision Makingcited by 113
- 2024LegalAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents in Legal Domaincited by 59
9 more
- 2024HealthQ: Unveiling Questioning Capabilities of LLM Chains in Healthcare Conversationscited by 31
- 2022A Survey on Recent Advances and Challenges in Reinforcement Learning Methods for Task-Oriented Dialogue Policy Learningcited by 30
- 2024ClarQ-LLM: A Benchmark for Models Clarifying and Requesting Information in Task-Oriented Dialogcited by 24
- 2024Empowering Language Models with Active Inquiry for Deeper Understandingcited by 11
- 2021Generating Usage-related Questions for Preference Elicitation in Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 10
- 2022Hierarchical Conversational Preference Elicitation with Bandit Feedbackcited by 10
- 2025Adaptive Elicitation of Latent Information Using Natural Languagecited by 7
- 2024Can Deception Detection Go Deeper? Dataset, Evaluation, and Benchmark for Deception Reasoningcited by 4
- 2020User Intention Recognition and Requirement Elicitation Method for Conversational AI Servicescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025SpeakRL: Synergizing Reasoning, Speaking, and Acting in Language Models with Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Agentic Conversational Search with Contextualized Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Interactive Dialogue Agents via Reinforcement Learning on Hindsight Regenerations
- 2025ChatR1: Reinforcement Learning for Conversational Reasoning and Retrieval Augmented Question Answering
- 2025Enhancing Personalized Multi-Turn Dialogue with Curiosity Reward
- 2026Dual Hierarchical Dialogue Policy Learning for Legal Inquisitive Conversational Agents
- 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgements
- 2023Blending Reward Functions via Few Expert Demonstrations for Faithful and Accurate Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Generation