mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ClarQ-LLM: A Benchmark for Models Clarifying and Requesting Information in Task-Oriented Dialog

arXiv 2409.06097 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2024cs.CLcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce ClarQ-LLM, an evaluation framework consisting of bilingual English-Chinese conversation tasks, conversational agents and evaluation metrics, designed to serve as a strong benchmark for assessing agents' ability to ask clarification questions in task-oriented dialogues. The benchmark includes 31 different task types, each with 10 unique dialogue scenarios between information seeker and provider agents. The scenarios require the seeker to ask questions to resolve uncertainty and gather necessary information to complete tasks. Unlike traditional benchmarks that evaluate agents based on fixed dialogue content, ClarQ-LLM includes a provider conversational agent to replicate the original human provider in the benchmark. This allows both current and future seeker agents to test their ability to complete information gathering tasks through dialogue by directly interacting with our provider agent. In tests, LLAMA3.1 405B seeker agent managed a maximum success rate of only 60.05%, showing that ClarQ-LLM presents a strong challenge for future research.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 13.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Creating General User Models from Computer Usecited by 44
  2. 2025Navigating Rifts in Human-LLM Grounding: Study and Benchmarkcited by 27
  3. 2026AgentNoiseBench: Benchmarking Robustness of Tool-Using LLM Agents Under Noisy Conditioncited by 19
  4. 2025ClarifyMT-Bench: Benchmarking and Improving Multi-Turn Clarification for Conversational Large Language Modelscited by 12
  5. 2026AgentAbstain: Do LLM Agents Know When Not to Act?cited by 8
  6. 2026ProactBench: Beyond What The User Asked Forcited by 4
  7. 2026Learning to Act under Noise: Enhancing Agent Robustness via Noisy Environmentscited by 4
  8. 2025Curiosity by Design: An LLM-based Coding Assistant Asking Clarification Questionscited by 3
  9. 2026Pause or Fabricate? Training Language Models for Grounded Reasoningcited by 2
  10. 2026Agentic Coding Needs Proactivity, Not Just Autonomycited by 2
  11. 2025Can LLMs Simulate L2-English Dialogue? An Information-Theoretic Analysis of L1-Dependent Biasescited by 1
  12. 2025Program Synthesis Dialog Agents for Interactive Decision-Makingcited by 1
8 more
  1. 2025MUG-Eval: A Proxy Evaluation Framework for Multilingual Generation Capabilities in Any Languagecited by 1
  2. 2026SCICONVBENCH: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn Clarification for Task Formulation in Computational Sciencecited by 1
  3. 2026RPS: Information Elicitation with Reinforcement Prompt Selectioncited by 0
  4. 2026CA-BED: Conversation-Aware Bayesian Experimental Designcited by 0
  5. 2026MIRA-Math: A Benchmark for Minimal Information Requesting and Mathematical Reasoningcited by 0
  6. 2026One More Turn, Less Regret: A Regret-Based Multi-Turn Benchmark for LLMs' Clarification Policiescited by 0
  7. 2026InsufficiencyBench: Evaluating LLM legal advice on underspecified user queriescited by 0
  8. 2026A Tri-Agent Framework for Evaluating and Aligning Question Clarification Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 0