AbsTopK: Rethinking Sparse Autoencoders For Bidirectional Features
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as powerful techniques for interpretability of large language models (LLMs), aiming to decompose hidden states into meaningful semantic features. While several SAE variants have been proposed, there remains no principled framework to derive SAEs from the original dictionary learning formulation. In this work, we introduce such a framework by unrolling the proximal gradient method for sparse coding. We show that a single-step update naturally recovers common SAE variants, including ReLU, JumpReLU, and TopK. Through this lens, we reveal a fundamental limitation of existing SAEs: their sparsity-inducing regularizers enforce non-negativity, preventing a single feature from representing bidirectional concepts (e.g., male vs. female). This structural constraint fragments semantic axes into separate, redundant features, limiting representational completeness. To address this issue, we propose AbsTopK SAE, a new variant derived from the ℓ0 sparsity constraint that applies hard thresholding over the largest-magnitude activations. By preserving both positive and negative activations, AbsTopK uncovers richer, bidirectional conceptual representations. Comprehensive experiments across four LLMs and seven probing and steering tasks show that AbsTopK improves reconstruction fidelity, enhances interpretability, and enables single features to encode contrasting concepts. Remarkably, AbsTopK matches or even surpasses the Difference-in-Mean method, a supervised approach that requires labeled data for each concept and has been shown in prior work to outperform SAEs.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 63 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.
Builds on
63 of 88 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Report14 May
Other references · 62
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
- 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 509
38 more
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
- 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 349
- 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 334
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 300
- 2024Bridging Language and Items for Retrieval and Recommendation: Benchmarking LLMs as Semantic Encoderscited by 224
- 2025AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoderscited by 218
- 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 212
- 2021Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmarkcited by 208
- 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 178
- 2016Linear Algebraic Structure of Word Senses, with Applications to Polysemycited by 165
- 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 160
- 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoderscited by 130
- 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretabilitycited by 124
- 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probingcited by 115
- 2024InterPLM: Discovering Interpretable Features in Protein Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 66
- 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignmentcited by 62
- 2025Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept Geometrycited by 61
- 2024Applying sparse autoencoders to unlearn knowledge in language modelscited by 59
- 2024Recurrent Neural Networks Learn to Store and Generate Sequences using Non-Linear Representationscited by 47
- 2024Decomposing The Dark Matter of Sparse Autoencoderscited by 45
- 2015Simple, Efficient, and Neural Algorithms for Sparse Codingcited by 37
- 2024Model Editing as a Robust and Denoised variant of DPO: A Case Study on Toxicitycited by 35
- 2024Evaluating Open-Source Sparse Autoencoders on Disentangling Factual Knowledge in GPT-2 Smallcited by 34
- 2024Towards Unifying Interpretability and Control: Evaluation via Interventioncited by 32
- 2023Low Rank Matrix Completion via Robust Alternating Minimization in Nearly Linear Timecited by 31
- 2025Automated Interpretability Metrics Do Not Distinguish Trained and Random Transformerscited by 30
- 2016A note on the sample complexity of the Er-SpUD algorithm by Spielman, Wang and Wright for exact recovery of sparsely used dictionariescited by 26
- 2025Beyond Prompt Engineering: Robust Behavior Control in LLMs via Steering Target Atomscited by 24
- 2022Bidirectional Feature Globalization for Few-shot Semantic Segmentation of 3D Point Cloud Scenescited by 23
- 2024Interpretability as Compression: Reconsidering SAE Explanations of Neural Activations with MDL-SAEscited by 23
- 2014Dictionary Learning and Tensor Decomposition via the Sum-of-Squares Methodcited by 22
- 2024PaCE: Parsimonious Concept Engineering for Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2025Position: Use Sparse Autoencoders to Discover Unknownscited by 19
- 2024Compute Optimal Inference and Provable Amortisation Gap in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 18
- 2024Analyzing (In)Abilities of SAEs via Formal Languagescited by 17
- 2025Interpreting and Steering Protein Language Models through Sparse Autoencoderscited by 17
- 2021Stable and Interpretable Unrolled Dictionary Learningcited by 15
- 2024Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders on Targeted Concept Erasure Taskscited by 15
50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.
9 papers.
- 2026Structuring Sparsity: Block-Sparse Featurizers Capture Visual Concept Manifoldscited by 5
- 2026Steering Without Breaking: Mechanistically Informed Interventions for Discrete Diffusion Language Modelscited by 3
- 2026Toward Identifiable Sparse Autoencoderscited by 2
- 2026Mechanistically Interpreting the Role of Sample Difficulty in RLVR for LLMscited by 1
- 2026Can Cross-Layer Transcoders Replace Vision Transformer Activations? An Interpretable Perspective on Visioncited by 0
- 2026Sign-Aware Gated Sparse Autoencoders: Modeling Anticorrelated Features with Bi-Jump-ReLU Activationscited by 0
- 2026Size Doesn't Matter: Cosine-Scored Sparse Autoencoderscited by 0
- 2026Towards Fast and Disentangled Counterfactuals for Visual Foundation Modelscited by 0
- 2026One Token Can Be Enough: Bridging Prompting and Activation Steering with Prefix Steeringcited by 0
- 2026One Token Can Be Enough: Bridging Prompting and Activation Steering with Prefix Steering4 Oct 2026
- 2026Towards Fast and Disentangled Counterfactuals for Visual Foundation Models1 Oct 2026
- 2026Structuring Sparsity: Block-Sparse Featurizers Capture Visual Concept Manifolds23 Jun 2026
- 2026Size Doesn't Matter: Cosine-Scored Sparse Autoencoders13 Jun 2026
- 2026Toward Identifiable Sparse Autoencoders29 May 2026
- 2026Mechanistically Interpreting the Role of Sample Difficulty in RLVR for LLMs27 May 2026
- 2026Sign-Aware Gated Sparse Autoencoders: Modeling Anticorrelated Features with Bi-Jump-ReLU Activations27 May 2026
- 2026Steering Without Breaking: Mechanistically Informed Interventions for Discrete Diffusion Language Models8 May 2026
- 2026Can Cross-Layer Transcoders Replace Vision Transformer Activations? An Interpretable Perspective on Vision14 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders
- 2026Sparse Autoencoders for Mechanistic Interpretability in NLP: A Critical Survey of Recoverability, Interpretability, and Utility
- 2025Empirical Evaluation of Progressive Coding for Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted Remedy
- 2025AdaptiveK: Complexity-Driven Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable Language Model Representations
- 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Models
- 2025Temporal Sparse Autoencoders: Leveraging the Sequential Nature of Language for Interpretability
- 2025Sparse Shift Autoencoders for Identifying Concepts from Large Language Model Activations