mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AbsTopK: Rethinking Sparse Autoencoders For Bidirectional Features

arXiv 2510.00404 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 9

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as powerful techniques for interpretability of large language models (LLMs), aiming to decompose hidden states into meaningful semantic features. While several SAE variants have been proposed, there remains no principled framework to derive SAEs from the original dictionary learning formulation. In this work, we introduce such a framework by unrolling the proximal gradient method for sparse coding. We show that a single-step update naturally recovers common SAE variants, including ReLU, JumpReLU, and TopK. Through this lens, we reveal a fundamental limitation of existing SAEs: their sparsity-inducing regularizers enforce non-negativity, preventing a single feature from representing bidirectional concepts (e.g., male vs. female). This structural constraint fragments semantic axes into separate, redundant features, limiting representational completeness. To address this issue, we propose AbsTopK SAE, a new variant derived from the ℓ0 sparsity constraint that applies hard thresholding over the largest-magnitude activations. By preserving both positive and negative activations, AbsTopK uncovers richer, bidirectional conceptual representations. Comprehensive experiments across four LLMs and seven probing and steering tasks show that AbsTopK improves reconstruction fidelity, enhances interpretability, and enables single features to encode contrasting concepts. Remarkably, AbsTopK matches or even surpasses the Difference-in-Mean method, a supervised approach that requires labeled data for each concept and has been shown in prior work to outperform SAEs.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 63 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

Builds on

63 of 88 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Report14 May

Other references · 62

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  2. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  3. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  4. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  5. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
  6. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  7. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  8. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
  9. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  10. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
  11. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  12. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 509
38 more
  1. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
  2. 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 349
  3. 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 334
  4. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 300
  5. 2024Bridging Language and Items for Retrieval and Recommendation: Benchmarking LLMs as Semantic Encoderscited by 224
  6. 2025AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoderscited by 218
  7. 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 212
  8. 2021Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmarkcited by 208
  9. 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 178
  10. 2016Linear Algebraic Structure of Word Senses, with Applications to Polysemycited by 165
  11. 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 160
  12. 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoderscited by 130
  13. 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretabilitycited by 124
  14. 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probingcited by 115
  15. 2024InterPLM: Discovering Interpretable Features in Protein Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 66
  16. 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignmentcited by 62
  17. 2025Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept Geometrycited by 61
  18. 2024Applying sparse autoencoders to unlearn knowledge in language modelscited by 59
  19. 2024Recurrent Neural Networks Learn to Store and Generate Sequences using Non-Linear Representationscited by 47
  20. 2024Decomposing The Dark Matter of Sparse Autoencoderscited by 45
  21. 2015Simple, Efficient, and Neural Algorithms for Sparse Codingcited by 37
  22. 2024Model Editing as a Robust and Denoised variant of DPO: A Case Study on Toxicitycited by 35
  23. 2024Evaluating Open-Source Sparse Autoencoders on Disentangling Factual Knowledge in GPT-2 Smallcited by 34
  24. 2024Towards Unifying Interpretability and Control: Evaluation via Interventioncited by 32
  25. 2023Low Rank Matrix Completion via Robust Alternating Minimization in Nearly Linear Timecited by 31
  26. 2025Automated Interpretability Metrics Do Not Distinguish Trained and Random Transformerscited by 30
  27. 2016A note on the sample complexity of the Er-SpUD algorithm by Spielman, Wang and Wright for exact recovery of sparsely used dictionariescited by 26
  28. 2025Beyond Prompt Engineering: Robust Behavior Control in LLMs via Steering Target Atomscited by 24
  29. 2022Bidirectional Feature Globalization for Few-shot Semantic Segmentation of 3D Point Cloud Scenescited by 23
  30. 2024Interpretability as Compression: Reconsidering SAE Explanations of Neural Activations with MDL-SAEscited by 23
  31. 2014Dictionary Learning and Tensor Decomposition via the Sum-of-Squares Methodcited by 22
  32. 2024PaCE: Parsimonious Concept Engineering for Large Language Modelscited by 19
  33. 2025Position: Use Sparse Autoencoders to Discover Unknownscited by 19
  34. 2024Compute Optimal Inference and Provable Amortisation Gap in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 18
  35. 2024Analyzing (In)Abilities of SAEs via Formal Languagescited by 17
  36. 2025Interpreting and Steering Protein Language Models through Sparse Autoencoderscited by 17
  37. 2021Stable and Interpretable Unrolled Dictionary Learningcited by 15
  38. 2024Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders on Targeted Concept Erasure Taskscited by 15

50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders
  2. 2026Sparse Autoencoders for Mechanistic Interpretability in NLP: A Critical Survey of Recoverability, Interpretability, and Utility
  3. 2025Empirical Evaluation of Progressive Coding for Sparse Autoencoders
  4. 2025On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted Remedy
  5. 2025AdaptiveK: Complexity-Driven Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable Language Model Representations
  6. 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Models
  7. 2025Temporal Sparse Autoencoders: Leveraging the Sequential Nature of Language for Interpretability
  8. 2025Sparse Shift Autoencoders for Identifying Concepts from Large Language Model Activations