mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploration and Exploitation Errors Are Measurable for Language Model Agents

arXiv 2604.13151 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Language Model (LM) agents are increasingly used in complex open-ended decision-making tasks, from AI coding to physical AI. A core requirement in these settings is the ability to both explore the problem space and exploit acquired knowledge effectively. However, systematically distinguishing and quantifying exploration and exploitation from observed actions without access to the agent's internal policy remains challenging. To address this, we design controllable environments inspired by practical embodied AI scenarios. Each environment consists of a partially observable 2D grid map and an unknown task Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). The map generation can be programmatically adjusted to emphasize exploration or exploitation difficulty. To enable policy-agnostic evaluation, we design a metric to quantify exploration and exploitation errors from agent's actions. We evaluate a variety of frontier LM agents and find that even state-of-the-art models struggle on our task, with different models exhibiting distinct failure modes. We further observe that reasoning models solve the task more effectively and show both exploration and exploitation can be significantly improved through minimal harness engineering. We release our code hrefhttps://github.com/jjj-madison/measurable-explore-exploithere.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 30 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.

Builds on

30 of 46 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026TAPE: Tool-Guided Adaptive Planning and Constrained Execution in Language Model Agents23 Feb
  2. 2026Calibrate-Then-Act: Cost-Aware Exploration in LLM Agents18 Feb
  3. 2024AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents24 Jan

Other references · 27

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  3. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  4. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
  5. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
  6. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
  7. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
  8. 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,143
  9. 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,029
  10. 2016Unifying Count-Based Exploration and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 632
  11. 2026Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfacescited by 515
  12. 2024AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agentscited by 359
15 more
  1. 2023Minigrid & Miniworld: Modular & Customizable Reinforcement Learning Environments for Goal-Oriented Taskscited by 320
  2. 2026Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnessescited by 248
  3. 2018BabyAI: A Platform to Study the Sample Efficiency of Grounded Language Learningcited by 238
  4. 2023T-Eval: Evaluating the Tool Utilization Capability of Large Language Models Step by Stepcited by 91
  5. 2024Beyond A*: Better Planning with Transformers via Search Dynamics Bootstrappingcited by 89
  6. 2024AutoFlow: Automated Workflow Generation for Large Language Model Agentscited by 76
  7. 2024Can large language models explore in-context?cited by 75
  8. 2024Code Repair with LLMs gives an Exploration-Exploitation Tradeoffcited by 50
  9. 2025Wider or Deeper? Scaling LLM Inference-Time Compute with Adaptive Branching Tree Searchcited by 48
  10. 2026Theory of Space: Can Foundation Models Construct Spatial Beliefs through Active Exploration?cited by 18
  11. 2025Should You Use Your Large Language Model to Explore or Exploit?cited by 8
  12. 2026Expanding LLM Agent Boundaries with Strategy-Guided Explorationcited by 7
  13. 2025In-Context Learning for Pure Explorationcited by 5
  14. 2025AnywhereVLA: Language-Conditioned Exploration and Mobile Manipulationcited by 3
  15. 2026Transformers in the Dark: Navigating Unknown Search Spaces via Bandit Feedbackcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Disentangling Exploration of Large Language Models by Optimal Exploitation
  2. 2023Towards A Unified Agent with Foundation Models
  3. 2026AgentGym2: Benchmarking Large Language Model Agents in De-Idealized Real-World Environments
  4. 2026Language-based Trial and Error Falls Behind in the Era of Experience
  5. 2023Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Models
  6. 2026A Behavioural and Representational Evaluation of Goal-Directedness in Language Model Agents
  7. 2026Beyond the Leaderboard: A Synthesis of Tool-Use, Planning, and Reasoning Failures in Large Language Model Agents
  8. 2025Why Do LLM Agents Fail in Exploring New Environments? A World-Modeling Perspective