A Behavioural and Representational Evaluation of Goal-Directedness in Language Model Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding an agent's goals helps explain and predict its behaviour, yet there is no established methodology for reliably attributing goals to agentic systems. We propose a framework for evaluating goal-directedness that integrates behavioural evaluation with interpretability-based analyses of models' internal representations. As a case study, we examine an LLM agent navigating a 2D grid world towards a goal state. Behaviourally, we evaluate the agent against optimal policies across varying grid sizes, obstacle densities, and goal structures, finding that performance scales with task difficulty while remaining robust to difficulty-preserving transformations and multi-goal structures. We then use probing methods to decode internal representations of the environment and multi-step action plans. We find that the LLM agent non-linearly encodes a coarse spatial map, preserving approximate task-relevant cues about its position and the goal location; that its actions are broadly consistent with these internal representations; and that reasoning reorganises them, shifting from spatial cues towards immediate action selection. Our findings support the view that introspective examination is required beyond behavioural evaluations to characterise how agents represent and pursue their objectives.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 31 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2026.
Builds on
31 of 52 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025AgentMisalignment: Measuring the Propensity for Misaligned Behaviour in LLM-Based Agents4 Jun
- 2025Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs12 Feb
- 2024The Reasons that Agents Act: Intention and Instrumental Goals11 Feb
Other references · 28
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
- 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 417
- 2023Minigrid & Miniworld: Modular & Customizable Reinforcement Learning Environments for Goal-Oriented Taskscited by 320
- 2023Emergent Linear Representations in World Models of Self-Supervised Sequence Modelscited by 313
- 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 306
- 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 298
- 2018A Survey of Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Methods and Progresscited by 294
- 2019Risks from Learned Optimization in Advanced Machine Learning Systemscited by 250
- 2017Inverse Reward Designcited by 246
- 2022The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspectivecited by 246
- 2021Implicit Representations of Meaning in Neural Language Modelscited by 179
- 2024AI Sandbagging: Language Models can Strategically Underperform on Evaluationscited by 131
16 more
- 2023Future Lens: Anticipating Subsequent Tokens from a Single Hidden Statecited by 116
- 2025Auditing language models for hidden objectivescited by 68
- 2024CUTE: Measuring LLMs' Understanding of Their Tokenscited by 28
- 2024Unlocking the Future: Exploring Look-Ahead Planning Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language Modelscited by 21
- 2024Planning in a recurrent neural network that plays Sokobancited by 17
- 2025Emergent Response Planning in LLMscited by 17
- 2025Lessons from a Chimp: AI "Scheming" and the Quest for Ape Languagecited by 16
- 2025Interpreting Emergent Planning in Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
- 2025Evaluating the Goal-Directedness of Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2025Spilling the Beans: Teaching LLMs to Self-Report Their Hidden Objectivescited by 13
- 2025Propositional Interpretability in Artificial Intelligencecited by 11
- 2025The Strawberry Problem: Emergence of Character-level Understanding in Tokenized Language Modelscited by 11
- 2025Auditing Games for Sandbaggingcited by 10
- 2024Towards Measuring Goal-Directedness in AI Systemscited by 7
- 2025The Limits of Predicting Agents from Behaviourcited by 3
- 2025Goal-Directedness is in the Eye of the Beholdercited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Interpreting Agentic Systems: Beyond Model Explanations to System-Level Accountability
- 2025Technical Report: Evaluating Goal Drift in Language Model Agents
- 2026What Do LLM Agents Know About Their World? Task2Quiz: A Paradigm for Studying Environment Understanding
- 2026From Actions to Understanding: Conformal Interpretability of Temporal Concepts in LLM Agents
- 2026Exploration and Exploitation Errors Are Measurable for Language Model Agents
- 2026From Features to Actions: Explainability in Traditional and Agentic AI Systems
- 2026EVOKE: Eliciting World Knowledge in Agents for Transferable Decision-Making
- 2026Agentic Cognitive Depth: Operational Criteria for Evaluating LLM Agents