mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

KITE: Keyframe-Indexed Tokenized Evidence for VLM-Based Robot Failure Analysis

arXiv 2604.07034 ↗First posted 8 Apr 2026cs.RO cs.AI cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models

Abstract (arXiv)

We present KITE, a training-free, keyframe-anchored, layout-grounded front-end that converts long robot-execution videos into compact, interpretable tokenized evidence for vision-language models (VLMs). KITE distills each trajectory into a small set of motion-salient keyframes with open-vocabulary detections and pairs each keyframe with a schematic bird's-eye-view (BEV) representation that encodes relative object layout, axes, timestamps, and detection confidence. These visual cues are serialized with robot-profile and scene-context tokens into a unified prompt, allowing the same front-end to support failure detection, identification, localization, explanation, and correction with an off-the-shelf VLM. On the RoboFAC benchmark, KITE with Qwen2.5-VL substantially improves over vanilla Qwen2.5-VL in the training-free setting, with especially large gains on simulation failure detection, identification, and localization, while remaining competitive with a RoboFAC-tuned baseline. A small QLoRA fine-tune further improves explanation and correction quality. We also report qualitative results on real dual-arm robots, demonstrating the practical applicability of KITE as a structured and interpretable front-end for robot failure analysis. Code and models are released on our project page: https://m80hz.github.io/kite/

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 43 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2026.

Builds on

43 of 56 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Manipulate-Anything: Automating Real-World Robots using Vision-Language Models27 Jun
  2. 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model6 Mar

Other references · 41

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  5. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
  6. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  7. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  8. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  9. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
  10. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
  11. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
  12. 2024Depth Anything V2cited by 1,385
29 more
  1. 2022A Generalist Agentcited by 802
  2. 2023VoxPoser: Composable 3D Value Maps for Robotic Manipulation with Language Modelscited by 733
  3. 2023Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Modelscited by 542
  4. 2022VIP: Towards Universal Visual Reward and Representation via Value-Implicit Pre-Trainingcited by 384
  5. 2024ReKep: Spatio-Temporal Reasoning of Relational Keypoint Constraints for Robotic Manipulationcited by 305
  6. 2023SayPlan: Grounding Large Language Models using 3D Scene Graphs for Scalable Robot Task Planningcited by 289
  7. 2021A Survey of Embodied AI: From Simulators to Research Taskscited by 256
  8. 2023Foundation Models in Robotics: Applications, Challenges, and the Futurecited by 212
  9. 2023ReWOO: Decoupling Reasoning from Observations for Efficient Augmented Language Modelscited by 174
  10. 2023REFLECT: Summarizing Robot Experiences for Failure Explanation and Correctioncited by 171
  11. 2023Scaling Up and Distilling Down: Language-Guided Robot Skill Acquisitioncited by 156
  12. 2018PDDLStream: Integrating Symbolic Planners and Blackbox Samplers via Optimistic Adaptive Planningcited by 147
  13. 2023Vision-Language Models as Success Detectorscited by 138
  14. 2023Large Language Models for Robotics: A Surveycited by 132
  15. 2023GenSim: Generating Robotic Simulation Tasks via Large Language Modelscited by 120
  16. 2024AHA: A Vision-Language-Model for Detecting and Reasoning Over Failures in Robotic Manipulationcited by 118
  17. 2023Toward General-Purpose Robots via Foundation Models: A Survey and Meta-Analysiscited by 99
  18. 2024CoPa: General Robotic Manipulation through Spatial Constraints of Parts with Foundation Modelscited by 97
  19. 2023Talk2BEV: Language-enhanced Bird's-eye View Maps for Autonomous Drivingcited by 88
  20. 2024DrEureka: Language Model Guided Sim-To-Real Transfercited by 78
  21. 2024ALOHA 2: An Enhanced Low-Cost Hardware for Bimanual Teleoperationcited by 61
  22. 2022LATTE: LAnguage Trajectory TransformErcited by 40
  23. 2024RePLan: Robotic Replanning with Perception and Language Modelscited by 39
  24. 2025RoboFAC: A Comprehensive Framework for Robotic Failure Analysis and Correctioncited by 37
  25. 2021Explainable AI for Robot Failures: Generating Explanations that Improve User Assistance in Fault Recoverycited by 32
  26. 2022CAPE: Corrective Actions from Precondition Errors using Large Language Modelscited by 30
  27. 2024I Can Tell What I am Doing: Toward Real-World Natural Language Grounding of Robot Experiencescited by 11
  28. 2023User Study Exploring the Role of Explanation of Failures by Robots in Human Robot Collaboration Taskscited by 5
  29. 2023Learning to Summarize and Answer Questions about a Virtual Robot's Past Actionscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026VLA-FAIL: Efficient Task Failure Detection for Finetuned Vision-Language-Action Models
  2. 2025I-FailSense: Towards General Robotic Failure Detection with Vision-Language Models
  3. 2026FailBench: How Reliable are VLMs at Judging Robot Task Success?
  4. 2025Guardian: Detecting Robotic Planning and Execution Errors with Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026FailureSpot: Label-Efficient Timestamp-Level Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action Models
  6. 2025FailSafe: Reasoning and Recovery from Failures in Vision-Language-Action Models
  7. 2026Hide-and-Seek in Trajectories: Discovering Failure Signals for VLA Runtime Monitoring
  8. 2026FLARE: A Failure-Aware Framework for Autonomous Correction and Recovery in Visual-Language Robotic Manipulation