mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

VLA-FAIL: Efficient Task Failure Detection for Finetuned Vision-Language-Action Models

arXiv 2606.21386 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 3

On the map: Vision-language-action models → Failure recovery and robustness

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language-action models (VLAs) achieve state-of-the-art performance on many robotic manipulation tasks, yet they can still behave unpredictably in out-of-distribution scenarios. Runtime failure detection is therefore essential for the safe real-world deployment of VLAs.However, existing task failure detectors require computationally expensive action sampling, are based on architectural assumptions that limit their applicability to VLAs, or need access to failure rollouts. We propose VLA-FAIL, a lightweight and broadly applicable failure detection framework for VLAs that combines two novel failure detectors with minimal overhead, without requiring failure data. The first, last-layer Mahalanobis distance (LLMD), detects out-of-distribution states by measuring token-wise deviations in last-layer features relative to the training data. The second, action chunk consistency (ACC), exploits the temporal overlap induced by receding-horizon control and detects failures when consecutive action chunks become inconsistent. To capture the trade-off between detection accuracy and detection latency, we introduce textscAUCPDT, a threshold-independent metric that jointly evaluates precision, recall, and detection time. Through extensive real-world and simulation experiments, we demonstrate that LLMD and ACC capture complementary failure modes whose combination enables reliable and early failure detection across diverse tasks, frequently outperforming significantly more expensive baseline methods. Project page: https://vla-fail.github.io/vla-fail-2026

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Failure recovery and robustness, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models. Builds on 26 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2026.

Builds on

26 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026CycleVLA: Proactive Self-Correcting Vision-Language-Action Models via Subtask Backtracking and Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding5 Jan
  2. 2025LIBERO-Plus: In-depth Robustness Analysis of Vision-Language-Action Models15 Oct
  3. 2025FailSafe: Reasoning and Recovery from Failures in Vision-Language-Action Models2 Oct
  4. 2025SAFE: Multitask Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action Models11 Jun

Other references · 22

  1. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,887
  2. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,407
  3. 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,761
  4. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
  5. 2025GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robotscited by 1,225
  6. 2023Florence-2: Advancing a Unified Representation for a Variety of Vision Taskscited by 410
  7. 2021Safe Learning in Robotics: From Learning-Based Control to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 371
  8. 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 365
  9. 2025X-VLA: Soft-Prompted Transformer as Scalable Cross-Embodiment Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 303
  10. 2021A Simple Fix to Mahalanobis Distance for Improving Near-OOD Detectioncited by 207
  11. 2018EnsembleDAgger: A Bayesian Approach to Safe Imitation Learningcited by 100
  12. 2025Scalable Vision-Language-Action Model Pretraining for Robotic Manipulation with Real-Life Human Activity Videoscited by 70
10 more
  1. 2024Unpacking Failure Modes of Generative Policies: Runtime Monitoring of Consistency and Progresscited by 69
  2. 2026Robometer: Scaling General-Purpose Robotic Reward Models via Trajectory Comparisonscited by 60
  3. 2025Can We Detect Failures Without Failure Data? Uncertainty-Aware Runtime Failure Detection for Imitation Learning Policiescited by 52
  4. 2025Failure Prediction at Runtime for Generative Robot Policiescited by 42
  5. 2025Robo-Dopamine: General Process Reward Modeling for High-Precision Robotic Manipulationcited by 40
  6. 2024Diff-DAgger: Uncertainty Estimation with Diffusion Policy for Robotic Manipulationcited by 33
  7. 2025Mahalanobis++: Improving OOD Detection via Feature Normalizationcited by 32
  8. 2026Rewind-IL: Online Failure Detection and State Respawning for Imitation Learningcited by 9
  9. 2026RC-NF: Robot-Conditioned Normalizing Flow for Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Robotic Manipulationcited by 8
  10. 2026Failure Identification in Imitation Learning Via Statistical and Semantic Filteringcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026FailureSpot: Label-Efficient Timestamp-Level Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action Models
  2. 2026VLA-Scope: Shift-Aware Failure Prediction for Vision-Language-Action Models
  3. 2026FATE-VLA:Failue-aware test generation for vision-language-action models
  4. 2025I-FailSense: Towards General Robotic Failure Detection with Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025VLA-Arena: An Open-Source Framework for Benchmarking Vision-Language-Action Models
  6. 2026Failing Forward: Adaptive Failure-Informed Learning for Vision-Language-Action Models
  7. 2026VLAMotor: Test-Guided Enhancement of Vision-Language-Action Models via Agent-BasedData Synthesis
  8. 2026Hide-and-Seek in Trajectories: Discovering Failure Signals for VLA Runtime Monitoring