mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FailureSpot: Label-Efficient Timestamp-Level Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action Models

arXiv 2609.04277 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2026cs.RO cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Vision-language-action models → Failure recovery and robustness

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies have shown strong potential for general-purpose robotic manipulation, but they can still fail unpredictably during long-horizon execution, making reliable failure detection essential for safe deployment. Existing methods either rely on visual models that typically detect failures only after erroneous actions have occurred, or use lightweight proactive detectors trained on VLA internal representations. However, these proactive methods are often supervised with trajectory-level labels, causing normal pre-failure behavior in unsuccessful trajectories to be incorrectly labeled as failure. This supervision mismatch introduces label noise and limits both trajectory-level detection accuracy and precise timestamp-level failure localization. In this work, we study fine-grained timestamp-level VLA failure detection while addressing the cost of dense annotation. We propose a data-efficient framework that first leverages unlabeled VLA action chunks to construct action-derived weak supervision signals, capturing abnormal patterns such as inconsistent consecutive chunks, frozen or idle actions, and aggressive random motions. We then use active learning to select only the most uncertain trajectories for timestamp-level annotation and fine-tune the detector with these informative labels. Experiments across multiple VLA policies show that our method improves both timestamp-level and trajectory-level failure detection performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Failure recovery and robustness, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models. Builds on 21 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.

Builds on

21 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026CycleVLA: Proactive Self-Correcting Vision-Language-Action Models via Subtask Backtracking and Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding5 Jan

Other references · 20

  1. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
  2. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
  3. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,297
  4. 2022RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scalecited by 2,007
  5. 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,653
  6. 2023Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardwarecited by 1,490
  7. 2024Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policycited by 1,427
  8. 2023LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learningcited by 1,338
  9. 2024Evaluating Real-World Robot Manipulation Policies in Simulationcited by 484
  10. 2024TinyVLA: Towards Fast, Data-Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotic Manipulationcited by 331
  11. 2024A Survey on Vision-Language-Action Models for Embodied AIcited by 274
  12. 2023Vision-Language Models as Success Detectorscited by 138
8 more
  1. 2024AHA: A Vision-Language-Model for Detecting and Reasoning Over Failures in Robotic Manipulationcited by 118
  2. 2025A Survey on Vision-Language-Action Models: An Action Tokenization Perspectivecited by 96
  3. 2025SafeVLA: Towards Safety Alignment of Vision-Language-Action Model via Constrained Learningcited by 69
  4. 2024Unpacking Failure Modes of Generative Policies: Runtime Monitoring of Consistency and Progresscited by 63
  5. 2025AGENTSAFE: Benchmarking the Safety of Embodied Agents on Hazardous Instructionscited by 33
  6. 2025Towards Robust and Secure Embodied AI: A Survey on Vulnerabilities and Attackscited by 32
  7. 2021The Importance of Being a Band: Finite-Sample Exact Distribution-Free Prediction Sets for Functional Datacited by 16
  8. 2026Foresight: Failure Detection for Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation with Action-Conditioned World Model Latentscited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026VLA-FAIL: Efficient Task Failure Detection for Finetuned Vision-Language-Action Models
  2. 2026Hide-and-Seek in Trajectories: Discovering Failure Signals for VLA Runtime Monitoring
  3. 2026FailPatch: Failure Residual Patching for Vision-Language-Action Models
  4. 2026Failing Forward: Adaptive Failure-Informed Learning for Vision-Language-Action Models
  5. 2025SAFE: Multitask Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action Models
  6. 2025FailSafe: Reasoning and Recovery from Failures in Vision-Language-Action Models
  7. 2025I-FailSense: Towards General Robotic Failure Detection with Vision-Language Models
  8. 2026VLA-Scope: Shift-Aware Failure Prediction for Vision-Language-Action Models