mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From CRUD to Autonomous Agents: Formal Validation and Zero-Trust Security for Semantic Gateways in AI-Native Enterprise Systems

arXiv 2604.25555 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Enterprise software engineering is shifting away from deterministic CRUD/REST architectures toward AI-native systems where large language models act as cognitive orchestrators. This transition introduces a critical security tension: probabilistic LLMs weaken classical mechanisms for validation, access control, and formal testing. This paper proposes the design, formal validation, and empirical evaluation of a Semantic Gateway governed by the Model Context Protocol (MCP). The gateway reframes the enterprise API as a semantic surface where tools are dynamically discovered, authorized, and executed based on intent and policy enforcement. The central contribution rests on a paradigm shift: autonomous agents must not be validated as traditional software nor as simple API consumers, but as stochastic state-transition systems whose behavior must be abstracted, fuzzed, and audited through enabled-tool graphs. The architecture introduces a three-layer Zero-Trust security model comprising a pre-inference Semantic Firewall, deterministic Tool-Level RBAC, and out-of-band Cryptographic Human-in-the-Loop approval. Enabledness-Preserving Abstractions (EPAs) and greybox semantic fuzzing--originally developed for blockchain smart contract verification--are adapted to audit agent behavior in enterprise environments. Results demonstrate an 84.2% reduction in incidental code. Across 500,000 multi-turn fuzzing sequences, the methodology achieved a 100% discovery rate of hidden unauthorized state transitions, proving that dynamic formal verification is strictly necessary for secure agentic deployment.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 1 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2026.

Builds on

1 of 21 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025AgentGuard: Runtime Verification of AI Agents28 Sep

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Authenticated Workflows: A Systems Approach to Protecting Agentic AI
  2. 2025Using the NANDA Index Architecture in Practice: An Enterprise Perspective
  3. 2026AGL-1: The Enterprise AI Governance Layer as a Control Plane for Trusted Enterprise Intelligence
  4. 2026Verifiable Agentic Infrastructure: Proof-Derived Authorization for Sovereign AI Systems
  5. 2026Toward Pre-Deployment Assurance for Enterprise AI Agents: Ontology-Grounded Simulation and Trust Certification
  6. 2026Digital Identity for Agentic Systems: Toward a Portable Authorization Standard for Autonomous Agents
  7. 2025From Cloud-Native to Trust-Native: A Protocol for Verifiable Multi-Agent Systems
  8. 2026AI Trust OS -- A Continuous Governance Framework for Autonomous AI Observability and Zero-Trust Compliance in Enterprise Environments