From CRUD to Autonomous Agents: Formal Validation and Zero-Trust Security for Semantic Gateways in AI-Native Enterprise Systems
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Enterprise software engineering is shifting away from deterministic CRUD/REST architectures toward AI-native systems where large language models act as cognitive orchestrators. This transition introduces a critical security tension: probabilistic LLMs weaken classical mechanisms for validation, access control, and formal testing. This paper proposes the design, formal validation, and empirical evaluation of a Semantic Gateway governed by the Model Context Protocol (MCP). The gateway reframes the enterprise API as a semantic surface where tools are dynamically discovered, authorized, and executed based on intent and policy enforcement. The central contribution rests on a paradigm shift: autonomous agents must not be validated as traditional software nor as simple API consumers, but as stochastic state-transition systems whose behavior must be abstracted, fuzzed, and audited through enabled-tool graphs. The architecture introduces a three-layer Zero-Trust security model comprising a pre-inference Semantic Firewall, deterministic Tool-Level RBAC, and out-of-band Cryptographic Human-in-the-Loop approval. Enabledness-Preserving Abstractions (EPAs) and greybox semantic fuzzing--originally developed for blockchain smart contract verification--are adapted to audit agent behavior in enterprise environments. Results demonstrate an 84.2% reduction in incidental code. Across 500,000 multi-turn fuzzing sequences, the methodology achieved a 100% discovery rate of hidden unauthorized state transitions, proving that dynamic formal verification is strictly necessary for secure agentic deployment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 1 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2026.
Builds on
1 of 21 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Authenticated Workflows: A Systems Approach to Protecting Agentic AI
- 2025Using the NANDA Index Architecture in Practice: An Enterprise Perspective
- 2026AGL-1: The Enterprise AI Governance Layer as a Control Plane for Trusted Enterprise Intelligence
- 2026Verifiable Agentic Infrastructure: Proof-Derived Authorization for Sovereign AI Systems
- 2026Toward Pre-Deployment Assurance for Enterprise AI Agents: Ontology-Grounded Simulation and Trust Certification
- 2026Digital Identity for Agentic Systems: Toward a Portable Authorization Standard for Autonomous Agents
- 2025From Cloud-Native to Trust-Native: A Protocol for Verifiable Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026AI Trust OS -- A Continuous Governance Framework for Autonomous AI Observability and Zero-Trust Compliance in Enterprise Environments