mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Trustworthy Orchestration Artificial Intelligence by the Ten Criteria with Control-Plane Governance

arXiv 2512.10304 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2025cs.AI cs.ETcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems increasingly assume consequential decision-making roles, a widening gap has emerged between technical capabilities and institutional accountability. Ethical guidance alone is insufficient to counter this challenge; it demands architectures that embed governance into the execution fabric of the ecosystem. This paper presents the Ten Criteria for Trustworthy Orchestration AI, a comprehensive assurance framework that integrates human input, semantic coherence, audit and provenance integrity into a unified Control-Panel architecture. Unlike conventional agentic AI initiatives that primarily focus on AI-to-AI coordination, the proposed framework provides an umbrella of governance to the entire AI components, their consumers and human participants. By taking aspiration from international standards and Australia's National Framework for AI Assurance initiative, this work demonstrates that trustworthiness can be systematically incorporated (by engineering) into AI systems, ensuring the execution fabric remains verifiable, transparent, reproducible and under meaningful human control.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 3 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2025.

Builds on

0 of 3 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026TRACE: A Metrologically-Grounded Engineering Framework for Trustworthy Agentic AI Systems in Operationally Critical Domains
  2. 2026AI Trust OS -- A Continuous Governance Framework for Autonomous AI Observability and Zero-Trust Compliance in Enterprise Environments
  3. 2026Trustworthy AI Posture (TAIP): A Framework for Continuous AI Assurance of Agentic Systems at Horizontal and Vertical scale
  4. 2026Trustworthy AI Software Engineers
  5. 2026Engineering Trustworthy Agentic AI for Critical Systems
  6. 2026Toward Safe and Responsible AI Agents: A Three-Pillar Model for Transparency, Accountability, and Trustworthiness
  7. 2026Building the ethical AI framework of the future: from philosophy to practice
  8. 2026Beyond Task Success: An Evidence-Synthesis Framework for Evaluating, Governing, and Orchestrating Agentic AI