Reset It and Forget It: Relearning Last-Layer Weights Improves Continual and Transfer Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work identifies a simple pre-training mechanism that leads to representations exhibiting better continual and transfer learning. This mechanism -- the repeated resetting of weights in the last layer, which we nickname "zapping" -- was originally designed for a meta-continual-learning procedure, yet we show it is surprisingly applicable in many settings beyond both meta-learning and continual learning. In our experiments, we wish to transfer a pre-trained image classifier to a new set of classes, in a few shots. We show that our zapping procedure results in improved transfer accuracy and/or more rapid adaptation in both standard fine-tuning and continual learning settings, while being simple to implement and computationally efficient. In many cases, we achieve performance on par with state of the art meta-learning without needing the expensive higher-order gradients, by using a combination of zapping and sequential learning. An intuitive explanation for the effectiveness of this zapping procedure is that representations trained with repeated zapping learn features that are capable of rapidly adapting to newly initialized classifiers. Such an approach may be considered a computationally cheaper type of, or alternative to, meta-learning rapidly adaptable features with higher-order gradients. This adds to recent work on the usefulness of resetting neural network parameters during training, and invites further investigation of this mechanism.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2023.
Builds on
28 of 45 references.
References · 28
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
- 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,187
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
- 2022The Primacy Bias in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 242
- 2019Meta-Learning Representations for Continual Learningcited by 189
- 2020Meta-Baseline: Exploring Simple Meta-Learning for Few-Shot Learningcited by 179
16 more
- 2023Understanding plasticity in neural networkscited by 170
- 2020The Early Phase of Neural Network Trainingcited by 114
- 2019Are All Layers Created Equal?cited by 94
- 2020Learning to Continually Learncited by 82
- 2021Continual Backprop: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Persistent Randomnesscited by 79
- 2018Fix your classifier: the marginal value of training the last weight layercited by 43
- 2023Improving Language Plasticity via Pretraining with Active Forgettingcited by 43
- 2022Fortuitous Forgetting in Connectionist Networkscited by 39
- 2020RIFLE: Backpropagation in Depth for Deep Transfer Learning through Re-Initializing the Fully-connected LayErcited by 27
- 2020Dropout as an Implicit Gating Mechanism For Continual Learningcited by 24
- 2021The Impact of Reinitialization on Generalization in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 20
- 2021Knowledge Evolution in Neural Networkscited by 18
- 2022When Does Re-initialization Work?cited by 12
- 2018Meta-Learning by the Baldwin Effectcited by 10
- 2018A Practitioners' Guide to Transfer Learning for Text Classification using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 7
- 2023Learn, Unlearn and Relearn: An Online Learning Paradigm for Deep Neural Networkscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
6 papers.
- 2025Mitigating Plasticity Loss in Continual Reinforcement Learning by Reducing Churncited by 22
- 2026Learning, Fast and Slow: Towards LLMs That Adapt Continuallycited by 6
- 2026Do Neural Networks Lose Plasticity in a Gradually Changing World?cited by 2
- 2026The Rank and Gradient Lost in Non-stationarity: Sample Weight Decay for Mitigating Plasticity Loss in Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
- 2026Beyond Single-Model Optimization: Preserving Plasticity in Continual Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2025How Weight Resampling and Optimizers Shape the Dynamics of Continual Learning and Forgetting in Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Learning, Fast and Slow: Towards LLMs That Adapt Continually12 May 2026
- 2026Beyond Single-Model Optimization: Preserving Plasticity in Continual Reinforcement Learning16 Apr 2026
- 2026The Rank and Gradient Lost in Non-stationarity: Sample Weight Decay for Mitigating Plasticity Loss in Reinforcement Learning2 Apr 2026
- 2026Do Neural Networks Lose Plasticity in a Gradually Changing World?9 Feb 2026
- 2025How Weight Resampling and Optimizers Shape the Dynamics of Continual Learning and Forgetting in Neural Networks2 Jul 2025
- 2025Mitigating Plasticity Loss in Continual Reinforcement Learning by Reducing Churn31 May 2025