mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimistic Online LQR via Intrinsic Rewards

arXiv 2603.28938 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2026eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Optimism in the face of uncertainty is a popular approach to balance exploration and exploitation in reinforcement learning. Here, we consider the online linear quadratic regulator (LQR) problem, i.e., to learn the LQR corresponding to an unknown linear dynamical system by adapting the control policy online based on closed-loop data collected during operation. In this work, we propose Intrinsic Rewards LQR (IR-LQR), an optimistic online LQR algorithm that applies the idea of intrinsic rewards originating from reinforcement learning and the concept of variance regularization to promote uncertainty-driven exploration. IR-LQR typically retains the structure of a standard LQR synthesis problem by only modifying the cost function, resulting in an intuitively pleasing, simple, computationally cheap, and efficient algorithm. This is in contrast to existing optimistic online LQR formulations that rely on more complicated iterative search algorithms or solve computationally demanding optimization problems. We show that IR-LQR achieves the optimal worst-case regret rate of √T, and compare it to various state-of-the-art online LQR algorithms via numerical experiments carried out on an aircraft pitch angle control and an unmanned aerial vehicle example.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2026.

Builds on

24 of 54 references.

References · 24

  1. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  2. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  3. 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
  4. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 727
  5. 2016Unifying Count-Based Exploration and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 632
  6. 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 420
  7. 2016Benchmarking Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Controlcited by 361
  8. 2017On Kernelized Multi-armed Banditscited by 348
  9. 2025π*0.6: a VLA That Learns From Experiencecited by 280
  10. 2018Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods for the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 211
  11. 2025Training Agents Inside of Scalable World Modelscited by 122
  12. 2020Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRcited by 111
12 more
  1. 2020Improper Learning for Non-Stochastic Controlcited by 83
  2. 2020Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning through Optimistic Policy Search and Planningcited by 83
  3. 2019Learning Linear-Quadratic Regulators Efficiently with only √T Regretcited by 67
  4. 2023A Tutorial on the Non-Asymptotic Theory of System Identificationcited by 26
  5. 2023Efficient Exploration in Continuous-time Model-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  6. 2020Reinforcement Learning with Fast Stabilization in Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 20
  7. 2020Efficient Optimistic Exploration in Linear-Quadratic Regulators via Lagrangian Relaxationcited by 18
  8. 2022Regret Lower Bounds for Learning Linear Quadratic Gaussian Systemscited by 11
  9. 2022Thompson Sampling Achieves tilde O(√T) Regret in Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 8
  10. 2023Nonasymptotic Regret Analysis of Adaptive Linear Quadratic Control with Model Misspecificationcited by 6
  11. 2025Regularization for Covariance Parameterization of Direct Data-Driven LQR Controlcited by 2
  12. 2025Policy Gradient Adaptive Control for the LQR: Indirect and Direct Approachescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.