Nonasymptotic Regret Analysis of Adaptive Linear Quadratic Control with Model Misspecification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The strategy of pre-training a large model on a diverse dataset, then fine-tuning for a particular application has yielded impressive results in computer vision, natural language processing, and robotic control. This strategy has vast potential in adaptive control, where it is necessary to rapidly adapt to changing conditions with limited data. Toward concretely understanding the benefit of pre-training for adaptive control, we study the adaptive linear quadratic control problem in the setting where the learner has prior knowledge of a collection of basis matrices for the dynamics. This basis is misspecified in the sense that it cannot perfectly represent the dynamics of the underlying data generating process. We propose an algorithm that uses this prior knowledge, and prove upper bounds on the expected regret after T interactions with the system. In the regime where T is small, the upper bounds are dominated by a term that scales with either textttpoly(log T) or √T, depending on the prior knowledge available to the learner. When T is large, the regret is dominated by a term that grows with δ T, where δ quantifies the level of misspecification. This linear term arises due to the inability to perfectly estimate the underlying dynamics using the misspecified basis, and is therefore unavoidable unless the basis matrices are also adapted online. However, it only dominates for large T, after the sublinear terms arising due to the error in estimating the weights for the basis matrices become negligible. We provide simulations that validate our analysis. Our simulations also show that offline data from a collection of related systems can be used as part of a pre-training stage to estimate a misspecified dynamics basis, which is in turn used by our adaptive controller.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2023.
Builds on
26 of 39 references.
References · 26
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2019RoboNet: Large-Scale Multi-Robot Learningcited by 268
- 2020Few-Shot Learning via Learning the Representation, Provablycited by 213
- 2020On the Theory of Transfer Learning: The Importance of Task Diversitycited by 186
- 2020Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRcited by 111
- 2020Information Theoretic Regret Bounds for Online Nonlinear Controlcited by 87
- 2018Regret Bounds for Robust Adaptive Control of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 86
- 2020Improper Learning for Non-Stochastic Controlcited by 83
- 2019Learning Linear-Quadratic Regulators Efficiently with only √T Regretcited by 67
- 2019The Nonstochastic Control Problemcited by 52
- 2022Statistical Learning Theory for Control: A Finite Sample Perspectivecited by 52
14 more
- 2020Logarithmic Regret Bound in Partially Observable Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 46
- 2020Logarithmic Regret for Learning Linear Quadratic Regulators Efficientlycited by 33
- 2020Finite-time Identification of Stable Linear Systems: Optimality of the Least-Squares Estimatorcited by 26
- 2023A Tutorial on the Non-Asymptotic Theory of System Identificationcited by 26
- 2022Multi-Task Imitation Learning for Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 22
- 2020Reinforcement Learning with Fast Stabilization in Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 20
- 2023Model-free Learning with Heterogeneous Dynamical Systems: A Federated LQR Approachcited by 19
- 2021Joint Learning of Linear Time-Invariant Dynamical Systemscited by 16
- 2021Minimal Expected Regret in Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 13
- 2023Sample-Efficient Linear Representation Learning from Non-IID Non-Isotropic Datacited by 12
- 2022Regret Lower Bounds for Learning Linear Quadratic Gaussian Systemscited by 11
- 2022Learning to Control Linear Systems can be Hardcited by 10
- 2020Minimax Adaptive Control for a Finite Set of Linear Systemscited by 4
- 2023An Online Learning Analysis of Minimax Adaptive Controlcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2025Coreset-Based Task Selection for Sample-Efficient Meta-Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2024Regret Analysis of Multi-task Representation Learning for Linear-Quadratic Adaptive Controlcited by 4
- 2024Learning to Stabilize Unknown LTI Systems on a Single Trajectory under Stochastic Noisecited by 2
- 2026Optimistic Online LQR via Intrinsic Rewardscited by 1
- 2025Logarithmic Regret for Nonlinear Controlcited by 0
- 2025Adversarially Robust Multitask Adaptive Controlcited by 0
- 2026Optimistic Online LQR via Intrinsic Rewards30 Mar 2026
- 2025Adversarially Robust Multitask Adaptive Control7 Nov 2025
- 2025Coreset-Based Task Selection for Sample-Efficient Meta-Reinforcement Learning4 Feb 2025
- 2025Logarithmic Regret for Nonlinear Control17 Jan 2025
- 2024Regret Analysis of Multi-task Representation Learning for Linear-Quadratic Adaptive Control8 Jul 2024
- 2024Learning to Stabilize Unknown LTI Systems on a Single Trajectory under Stochastic Noise31 May 2024