DEX-AR: A Dynamic Explainability Method for Autoregressive Vision-Language Models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
As Vision-Language Models (VLMs) become increasingly sophisticated and widely used, it becomes more and more crucial to understand their decision-making process. Traditional explainability methods, designed for classification tasks, struggle with modern autoregressive VLMs due to their complex token-by-token generation process and intricate interactions between visual and textual modalities. We present DEX-AR (Dynamic Explainability for AutoRegressive models), a novel explainability method designed to address these challenges by generating both per-token and sequence-level 2D heatmaps highlighting image regions crucial for the model's textual responses. The proposed method offers to interpret autoregressive VLMs-including varying importance of layers and generated tokens-by computing layer-wise gradients with respect to attention maps during the token-by-token generation process. DEX-AR introduces two key innovations: a dynamic head filtering mechanism that identifies attention heads focused on visual information, and a sequence-level filtering approach that aggregates per-token explanations while distinguishing between visually-grounded and purely linguistic tokens. Our evaluation on ImageNet, VQAv2, and PascalVOC, shows a consistent improvement in both perturbation-based metrics, using a novel normalized perplexity measure, as well as segmentation-based metrics.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 38 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.
Builds on
38 of 44 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024PaliGemma: A versatile 3B VLM for transfer10 Jul
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation28 Jan
Other references · 36
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
24 more
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
- 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 844
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
- 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 629
- 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
- 2023HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 572
- 2023Florence-2: Advancing a Unified Representation for a Variety of Vision Taskscited by 403
- 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
- 2023Explainability for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 331
- 2021Generic Attention-model Explainability for Interpreting Bi-Modal and Encoder-Decoder Transformerscited by 316
- 2023Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based Decompositioncited by 189
- 2015Visualizing and Understanding Recurrent Networkscited by 158
- 2019On Identifiability in Transformerscited by 115
- 2022Towards Opening the Black Box of Neural Machine Translation: Source and Target Interpretations of the Transformercited by 45
- 2022On the Explainability of Natural Language Processing Deep Modelscited by 37
- 2024Interpreting the Second-Order Effects of Neurons in CLIPcited by 36
- 2024LeGrad: An Explainability Method for Vision Transformers via Feature Formation Sensitivitycited by 32
- 2025Token Activation Map to Visually Explain Multimodal LLMscited by 30
- 2024VIAssist: Adapting Multi-modal Large Language Models for Users with Visual Impairmentscited by 24
- 2024VIALM: A Survey and Benchmark of Visually Impaired Assistance with Large Modelscited by 23
- 2023Visual Explanations via Iterated Integrated Attributionscited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Attending to Multimodal Generation One Token at a Timecited by 0
- 2026Attending to Multimodal Generation One Token at a Time4 Jul 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Autoregressive Semantic Visual Reconstruction Helps VLMs Understand Better
- 2024FastRM: An efficient and automatic explainability framework for multimodal generative models
- 2026Logit Lens Supervision for Patch-Level Explanations in Vision-Language Models
- 2024GIFT: A Framework Towards Global Interpretable Faithful Textual Explanations of Vision Classifiers
- 2026Language Models Can Explain Visual Features via Steering
- 2026UVU: Improving Multimodal Understanding via Vision-Language Unified Autoregressive Paradigm
- 2025Where MLLMs Attend and What They Rely On: Explaining Autoregressive Token Generation
- 2025REAR: Rethinking Visual Autoregressive Models via Generator-Tokenizer Consistency Regularization