Before the Tool Call: Deterministic Pre-Action Authorization for Autonomous AI Agents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI agents today have passwords but no permission slips. They execute tool calls (fund transfers, database queries, shell commands, sub-agent delegation) with no standard mechanism to enforce authorization before the action executes. Current safety architectures rely on model alignment (probabilistic, training-time) and post-hoc evaluation (retrospective, batch). Neither provides deterministic, policy-based enforcement at the individual tool call level. We characterize this gap as the pre-action authorization problem and present the Open Agent Passport (OAP), an open specification and reference implementation that intercepts tool calls synchronously before execution, evaluates them against a declarative policy, and produces a cryptographically signed audit record. OAP enforces authorization decisions in a measured median of 53 ms (N=1,000). In a live adversarial testbed (4,437 authorization decisions across 1,151 sessions, 5,000 bounty), social engineering succeeded against the model 74.6% of the time under a permissive policy; under a restrictive OAP policy, a comparable population of attackers achieved a 0% success rate across 879 attempts. We distinguish pre-action authorization from sandboxed execution (contains blast radius but does not prevent unauthorized actions) and model-based screening (probabilistic), and show they are complementary. The same infrastructure that enforces security constraints (spending limits, capability scoping) also enforces quality gates, operational contracts, and compliance controls. The specification is released under Apache 2.0 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18901596).
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2026.
Builds on
9 of 30 references.
References · 9
- 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
- 2023Removing RLHF Protections in GPT-4 via Fine-Tuningcited by 171
- 2026Formal Policy Enforcement for Real-World Agentic Systemscited by 33
- 2025Building a Foundational Guardrail for General Agentic Systems via Synthetic Datacited by 29
- 2026The Attack and Defense Landscape of Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 28
- 2025ceLLMate: Sandboxing Browser AI Agentscited by 16
- 2026AgentGuardian: Learning Access Control Policies to Govern AI Agent Behaviorcited by 11
- 2026Proof-of-Guardrail in AI Agents and What (Not) to Trust from Itcited by 4
- 2026Trustworthy Agentic AI Requires Deterministic Architectural Boundariescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 13.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2026SoK: Security of Autonomous LLM Agents in Agentic Commercecited by 8
- 2026Sovereign Agentic Loops: Decoupling AI Reasoning from Execution in Real-World Systemscited by 5
- 2026Organizational Control Layer: Governance Infrastructure at the Execution Boundary of LLM Agent Systemscited by 3
- 2026Protocol-Level Attacks on Agentic Commerce Platforms: A Cross-Platform Taxonomy, AIP-Bench, and Unified Defensecited by 2
- 2026Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Executioncited by 1
- 2026Constraining Host-Level Abuse in Self-Hosted Computer-Use Agents via TEE-Backed Isolationcited by 1
- 2026Right-to-Act: A Pre-Execution Non-Compensatory Decision Protocol for AI Systemscited by 0
- 2026Toward Self-Evolution-Ready Workflow Harnesses: A Reversible Migration Path and Convertibility Taxonomy for Expert LLM Pipelinescited by 0
- 2026Governing Actions, Not Agents: Institutional Attestation as a Governance Model for Autonomous AI Systemscited by 0
- 2026The Balkanization of Execution-Security Research for AI Coding Agents: Isolation, Access Control, and Time-of-Check-to-Time-of-Use Vulnerabilitiescited by 0
- 2026RAIL Guard: Closing the Evaluation-to-Remediation Gap in Responsible AI for LLM Agentscited by 0
- 2026The Vulnerability With No CVE: Managing Persistent Gaps Between Mandate and Authority in AI Coding Agentscited by 0
1 more
- 2026Beyond Training: A Feasibility Taxonomy for Inference-Time AI Governance9 Sep 2026
- 2026The Vulnerability With No CVE: Managing Persistent Gaps Between Mandate and Authority in AI Coding Agents6 Aug 2026
- 2026Protocol-Level Attacks on Agentic Commerce Platforms: A Cross-Platform Taxonomy, AIP-Bench, and Unified Defense23 Jul 2026
- 2026The Balkanization of Execution-Security Research for AI Coding Agents: Isolation, Access Control, and Time-of-Check-to-Time-of-Use Vulnerabilities7 Jul 2026
- 2026Governing Actions, Not Agents: Institutional Attestation as a Governance Model for Autonomous AI Systems24 Jun 2026
- 2026Toward Self-Evolution-Ready Workflow Harnesses: A Reversible Migration Path and Convertibility Taxonomy for Expert LLM Pipelines15 Jun 2026
- 2026Organizational Control Layer: Governance Infrastructure at the Execution Boundary of LLM Agent Systems3 Jun 2026
- 2026RAIL Guard: Closing the Evaluation-to-Remediation Gap in Responsible AI for LLM Agents28 May 2026
- 2026Constraining Host-Level Abuse in Self-Hosted Computer-Use Agents via TEE-Backed Isolation7 May 2026
- 2026Right-to-Act: A Pre-Execution Non-Compensatory Decision Protocol for AI Systems27 Apr 2026
- 2026Sovereign Agentic Loops: Decoupling AI Reasoning from Execution in Real-World Systems24 Apr 2026
- 2026Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution16 Apr 2026
1 more
- 2026SoK: Security of Autonomous LLM Agents in Agentic Commerce15 Apr 2026
- 2026SoK: Security of Autonomous LLM Agents in Agentic Commercecited by 8
- 2026Organizational Control Layer: Governance Infrastructure at the Execution Boundary of LLM Agent Systemscited by 3
- 2026Protocol-Level Attacks on Agentic Commerce Platforms: A Cross-Platform Taxonomy, AIP-Bench, and Unified Defensecited by 2
- 2026Constraining Host-Level Abuse in Self-Hosted Computer-Use Agents via TEE-Backed Isolationcited by 1
- 2026The Balkanization of Execution-Security Research for AI Coding Agents: Isolation, Access Control, and Time-of-Check-to-Time-of-Use Vulnerabilitiescited by 0
- 2026RAIL Guard: Closing the Evaluation-to-Remediation Gap in Responsible AI for LLM Agentscited by 0
- 2026The Vulnerability With No CVE: Managing Persistent Gaps Between Mandate and Authority in AI Coding Agentscited by 0
- 2026The Vulnerability With No CVE: Managing Persistent Gaps Between Mandate and Authority in AI Coding Agents6 Aug 2026
- 2026Protocol-Level Attacks on Agentic Commerce Platforms: A Cross-Platform Taxonomy, AIP-Bench, and Unified Defense23 Jul 2026
- 2026The Balkanization of Execution-Security Research for AI Coding Agents: Isolation, Access Control, and Time-of-Check-to-Time-of-Use Vulnerabilities7 Jul 2026
- 2026Organizational Control Layer: Governance Infrastructure at the Execution Boundary of LLM Agent Systems3 Jun 2026
- 2026RAIL Guard: Closing the Evaluation-to-Remediation Gap in Responsible AI for LLM Agents28 May 2026
- 2026Constraining Host-Level Abuse in Self-Hosted Computer-Use Agents via TEE-Backed Isolation7 May 2026
- 2026SoK: Security of Autonomous LLM Agents in Agentic Commerce15 Apr 2026
- 2026Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Executioncited by 1
- 2026Right-to-Act: A Pre-Execution Non-Compensatory Decision Protocol for AI Systemscited by 0
- 2026Toward Self-Evolution-Ready Workflow Harnesses: A Reversible Migration Path and Convertibility Taxonomy for Expert LLM Pipelinescited by 0
- 2026Governing Actions, Not Agents: Institutional Attestation as a Governance Model for Autonomous AI Systemscited by 0
- 2026Beyond Training: A Feasibility Taxonomy for Inference-Time AI Governancecited by 0
- 2026Beyond Training: A Feasibility Taxonomy for Inference-Time AI Governance9 Sep 2026
- 2026Governing Actions, Not Agents: Institutional Attestation as a Governance Model for Autonomous AI Systems24 Jun 2026
- 2026Toward Self-Evolution-Ready Workflow Harnesses: A Reversible Migration Path and Convertibility Taxonomy for Expert LLM Pipelines15 Jun 2026
- 2026Right-to-Act: A Pre-Execution Non-Compensatory Decision Protocol for AI Systems27 Apr 2026
- 2026Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution16 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Authorization Architectures for Tool-Using AI Agents
- 2026Cryptographically verifiable authorization for autonomous AI agents: a falsifiable hypothesis and proof of concept
- 2025Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agents
- 2026Behavioral Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: The AgentBound Framework
- 2026AgentWall: A Runtime Safety Layer for Local AI Agents
- 2026Uncovering Security Threats and Architecting Defenses in Autonomous Agents: A Case Study of OpenClaw
- 2026OpenAgentFlow: Enabling System-Wide Safety Boundaries for Heterogeneous AI Agent Fleets
- 2026ClawLess: A Security Model of AI Agents