mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sovereign Agentic Loops: Decoupling AI Reasoning from Execution in Real-World Systems

arXiv 2604.22136 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2026cs.CR cs.LGcited by 5

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly issue API calls that mutate real systems, yet many current architectures pass stochastic model outputs directly to execution layers. We argue that this coupling creates a safety risk because model correctness, context awareness, and alignment cannot be assumed at execution time. We introduce Sovereign Agentic Loops (SAL), a control-plane architecture in which models emit structured intents with justifications, and the control plane validates those intents against true system state and policy before execution. SAL combines an obfuscation membrane, which limits model access to identity-sensitive state, with a cryptographically linked Evidence Chain for auditability and replay. We formalize SAL and show that, under the stated assumptions, it provides policy-bounded execution, identity isolation, and deterministic replay. In an OpenKedge prototype for cloud infrastructure, SAL blocks 93% of unsafe intents at the policy layer, rejects the remaining 7% via consistency checks, prevents unsafe executions in our benchmark, and adds 12.4 ms median latency.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.

Builds on

13 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems9 Dec

Other references · 12

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  4. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 559
  5. 2025AgentSpec: Customizable Runtime Enforcement for Safe and Reliable LLM Agentscited by 196
  6. 2026Towards Verifiably Safe Tool Use for LLM Agentscited by 34
  7. 2026The 2025 AI Agent Index: Documenting Technical and Safety Features of Deployed Agentic AI Systemscited by 27
  8. 2025ProbGuard: Proactive Runtime Monitoring for LLM Agent Safety via Probabilistic Predictioncited by 25
  9. 2026Before the Tool Call: Deterministic Pre-Action Authorization for Autonomous AI Agentscited by 12
  10. 2025Tiered Agentic Oversight: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent System for Healthcare Safetycited by 7
  11. 2026OpenKedge: Governing Agentic Mutation with Execution-Bound Safety and Evidence Chainscited by 4
  12. 2026Beyond Static Sandboxing: Learned Capability Governance for Autonomous AI Agentscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Unfireable Safety Kernel: Execution-Time AI Alignment for AI Agents and Other Escapable AI Systems
  2. 2025Safe, Untrusted, "Proof-Carrying" AI Agents: toward the agentic lakehouse
  3. 2026Safety Does Not Compose: Non-Decaying Loop State for Autonomous LLM Agents
  4. 2026Engineering Reliable Commit Gates for Agentic AI: Cost-Aware Verification Portfolios under Common-Mode Data Failures
  5. 2026Trustworthy Agentic AI Requires Deterministic Architectural Boundaries
  6. 2026Trustworthy Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Cybersecurity and Systems Survey on Threat Landscapes, Defense Architectures, and Open Challenges
  7. 2026Securing LLM Agents Need Intent-to-Execution Integrity
  8. 2026The Balkanization of Execution-Security Research for AI Coding Agents: Isolation, Access Control, and Time-of-Check-to-Time-of-Use Vulnerabilities