mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Uncovering Security Threats and Architecting Defenses in Autonomous Agents: A Case Study of OpenClaw

arXiv 2603.12644 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2026cs.CRcited by 18

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) into autonomous, tool-calling agents has fundamentally altered the cybersecurity landscape. Frameworks like OpenClaw grant AI systems operating-system-level permissions and the autonomy to execute complex workflows. This level of access creates unprecedented security challenges. Consequently, traditional content-filtering defenses have become obsolete. This report presents a comprehensive security analysis of the OpenClaw ecosystem. We systematically investigate its current threat landscape, highlighting critical vulnerabilities such as prompt injection-driven Remote Code Execution (RCE), sequential tool attack chains, context amnesia, and supply chain contamination. To systematically contextualize these threats, we propose a novel tri-layered risk taxonomy for autonomous Agents, categorizing vulnerabilities across AI Cognitive, Software Execution, and Information System dimensions. To address these systemic architectural flaws, we introduce the Full-Lifecycle Agent Security Architecture (FASA). This theoretical defense blueprint advocates for zero-trust agentic execution, dynamic intent verification, and cross-layer reasoning-action correlation. Building on this framework, we present Project ClawGuard, our ongoing engineering initiative. This project aims to implement the FASA paradigm and transition autonomous agents from high-risk experimental utilities into trustworthy systems. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/NY1024/ClawGuard.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 20 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2026.

Builds on

20 of 46 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SecureWebArena: A Holistic Security Evaluation Benchmark for LVLM-based Web Agents11 Oct
  2. 2025Manipulating Multimodal Agents via Cross-Modal Prompt Injection19 Apr

Other references · 18

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  4. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  5. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  6. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
  7. 2024Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agentscited by 537
  8. 2024MAGIS: LLM-Based Multi-Agent Framework for GitHub Issue Resolutioncited by 132
  9. 2024FinCon: A Synthesized LLM Multi-Agent System with Conceptual Verbal Reinforcement for Enhanced Financial Decision Makingcited by 112
  10. 2024LLM Hallucinations in Practical Code Generation: Phenomena, Mechanism, and Mitigationcited by 92
  11. 2025Reasoning-Augmented Conversation for Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Modelscited by 61
  12. 2023Extending Context Window of Large Language Models via Semantic Compressioncited by 45
6 more
  1. 2025LLM Agents Making Agent Toolscited by 45
  2. 2025Towards Understanding the Safety Boundaries of DeepSeek Models: Evaluation and Findingscited by 24
  3. 2025Pushing the Limits of Safety: A Technical Report on the ATLAS Challenge 2025cited by 11
  4. 2025Detoxifying Large Language Models via Autoregressive Reward Guided Representation Editingcited by 9
  5. 2026Real Money, Fake Models: Deceptive Model Claims in Shadow APIscited by 8
  6. 2025Uncovering Strategic Egoism Behaviors in Large Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 18.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026ClawKeeper: Comprehensive Safety Protection for OpenClaw Agents Through Skills, Plugins, and Watcherscited by 18
  2. 2026A Systematic Security Evaluation of OpenClaw and Its Variantscited by 11
  3. 2026Seeing Is Not Screening: Multimodal Hidden Instruction Attacks on Agent Skill Scannerscited by 5
  4. 2026LivePI: More Realistic Benchmarking of Agents Against Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 3
  5. 2026ColluSkill: Adversarial Cross-Skill Composition for Evading Agent Skill Scannerscited by 3
  6. 2026SentinelAgent: Intent-Verified Delegation Chains for Securing Federal Multi-Agent AI Systemscited by 2
  7. 2026SUDP: Secret-Use Delegation Protocol for Agentic Systemscited by 2
  8. 2026Agent-ValueBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Agent Valuescited by 2
  9. 2026SafeClawBench: Separating Semantic, Audit-Evidence, and Sandbox Harm in Tool-Using LLM Agentscited by 2
  10. 2026When Convenience Becomes Risk: A Semantic View of Under-Specification in Host-Acting Agentscited by 1
  11. 2026Constraining Host-Level Abuse in Self-Hosted Computer-Use Agents via TEE-Backed Isolationcited by 1
  12. 2026Security of OpenClaw Agents: Fundamentals, Attacks, and Countermeasurescited by 1
6 more
  1. 2026Provably Secure Agent Guardrailcited by 0
  2. 2026Understanding and mitigating the risks of OpenClaw for non-technical users: A practical guide with Skillcited by 0
  3. 2026RT-SHCUA: Real-Time Self-Hosted Computer-Use Agent for UAV Controlcited by 0
  4. 2026Self-State Attacks on Self-Hosted AI Agents: How Far Can OS Defenses Go?cited by 0
  5. 2026OpenClaw and Ollama in Agentic AI: Toward Fully Autonomous and Scalable AI Agent Systemscited by 0
  6. 2026Skillsets on the Chain: A Blockchain-based Zero-Trust Framework for Agentic AI Networkingcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Security Attack and Defense Strategies for Autonomous Agent Frameworks: A Layered Review with OpenClaw as a Case Study
  2. 2026Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Autonomous LLM Agent Threats
  3. 2026A Security Analysis of the OpenClaw AI Agent Framework
  4. 2026Clawed and Dangerous: Can We Trust Open Agentic Systems?
  5. 2026Your Agent, Their Asset: A Real-World Safety Analysis of OpenClaw
  6. 2026Toward Securing AI Agents Like Operating Systems
  7. 2026Governance Architecture for Autonomous Agent Systems: Threats, Framework, and Engineering Practice
  8. 2026Understanding and Evaluating Claw-like Agent Security Through a Computer-Systems Lens