mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AgentWall: A Runtime Safety Layer for Local AI Agents

arXiv 2605.16265 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2026cs.AI cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The safety of autonomous AI agents is increasingly recognized as a critical open problem. As agents transition from passive text generators to active actors capable of executing shell commands, modifying files, calling APIs, and browsing the web, the consequences of unsafe or adversarially manipulated behavior become immediate and tangible. Existing AI safety work has focused primarily on model alignment and input filtering, but these approaches do not address what happens at the moment an agent's intent becomes a real action on a real machine. This gap is especially acute in local environments, where developers run agents against their own filesystems, credentials, and infrastructure with little runtime control. This paper introduces AgentWall, a runtime safety and observability layer for local AI agents. AgentWall intercepts every proposed agent action before it reaches the host environment, evaluates it against an explicit declarative policy, requires human approval for sensitive operations, and records a complete execution trail for audit and replay. It is implemented as a policy-enforcing MCP proxy and native OpenClaw plugin, working across Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code, and OpenClaw with a single install command. We present the design, architecture, threat model, and policy model of AgentWall, and demonstrate 92.9% policy enforcement accuracy with sub-millisecond overhead across 14 benchmark tests. AgentWall is open-source at https://github.com/agentwall/Agentwall.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.

Builds on

8 of 19 references.

References · 8

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  3. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  4. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
  5. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
  6. 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 568
  7. 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 347
  8. 2025LlamaFirewall: An open source guardrail system for building secure AI agentscited by 114

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Agent Safety Should Be a Runtime Contract
  2. 2026AgentTrust: Runtime Safety Evaluation and Interception for AI Agent Tool Use
  3. 2026AgentDoG 1.5: A Lightweight and Scalable Alignment Framework for AI Agent Safety and Security
  4. 2026OpenAgentFlow: Enabling System-Wide Safety Boundaries for Heterogeneous AI Agent Fleets
  5. 2026AgentWard: A Lifecycle Security Architecture for Autonomous AI Agents
  6. 2026SafeAgent: A Runtime Protection Architecture for Agentic Systems
  7. 2023Testing Language Model Agents Safely in the Wild
  8. 2025OpenAgentSafety: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Real-World AI Agent Safety