SPEGC: Continual Test-Time Adaptation via Semantic-Prompt-Enhanced Graph Clustering for Medical Image Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In medical image segmentation tasks, the domain gap caused by the difference in data collection between training and testing data seriously hinders the deployment of pre-trained models in clinical practice. Continual Test-Time Adaptation (CTTA) aims to enable pre-trained models to adapt to continuously changing unlabeled domains, providing an effective approach to solving this problem. However, existing CTTA methods often rely on unreliable supervisory signals, igniting a self-reinforcing cycle of error accumulation that culminates in catastrophic performance degradation. To overcome these challenges, we propose a CTTA via Semantic-Prompt-Enhanced Graph Clustering (SPEGC) for medical image segmentation. First, we design a semantic prompt feature enhancement mechanism that utilizes decoupled commonality and heterogeneity prompt pools to inject global contextual information into local features, alleviating their susceptibility to noise interference under domain shift. Second, based on these enhanced features, we design a differentiable graph clustering solver. This solver reframes global edge sparsification as an optimal transport problem, allowing it to distill a raw similarity matrix into a refined and high-order structural representation in an end-to-end manner. Finally, this robust structural representation is used to guide model adaptation, ensuring predictions are consistent at a cluster-level and dynamically adjusting decision boundaries. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SPEGC outperforms other state-of-the-art CTTA methods on two medical image segmentation benchmarks. The source code is available at https://github.com/Jwei-Z/SPEGC-for-MIS.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2026.
Builds on
48 of 71 references.
References · 48
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2021Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentationcited by 2,338
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
- 2019Kvasir-SEG: A Segmented Polyp Datasetcited by 588
- 2020FDA: Fourier Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 540
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
- 2017Structure-measure: A New Way to Evaluate Foreground Mapscited by 480
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
36 more
- 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
- 2018Enhanced-alignment Measure for Binary Foreground Map Evaluationcited by 370
- 2019ResUNet-a: a deep learning framework for semantic segmentation of remotely sensed datacited by 260
- 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 258
- 2021Exploring Cross-Image Pixel Contrast for Semantic Segmentationcited by 242
- 2019REFUGE Challenge: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Automated Methods for Glaucoma Assessment from Fundus Photographscited by 226
- 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 208
- 2023Segment and Track Anythingcited by 193
- 2022Rethinking Semantic Segmentation: A Prototype Viewcited by 140
- 2021The Norm Must Go On: Dynamic Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Normalizationcited by 131
- 2023EcoTTA: Memory-Efficient Continual Test-time Adaptation via Self-distilled Regularizationcited by 123
- 2022Robust Mean Teacher for Continual and Gradual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 102
- 2022Decorate the Newcomers: Visual Domain Prompt for Continual Test Time Adaptationcited by 98
- 2019Instance Segmentation by Jointly Optimizing Spatial Embeddings and Clustering Bandwidthcited by 88
- 2022GMMSeg: Gaussian Mixture based Generative Semantic Segmentation Modelscited by 87
- 2022Deep Hierarchical Semantic Segmentationcited by 84
- 2022SIGMA: Semantic-complete Graph Matching for Domain Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 74
- 2024OMG-Seg: Is One Model Good Enough For All Segmentation?cited by 73
- 2017Transfer Learning for Domain Adaptation in MRI: Application in Brain Lesion Segmentationcited by 66
- 2022Reusing the Task-specific Classifier as a Discriminator: Discriminator-free Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 66
- 2022CMT-DeepLab: Clustering Mask Transformers for Panoptic Segmentationcited by 60
- 2017Recurrent Pixel Embedding for Instance Groupingcited by 57
- 2021NeoUNet: Towards accurate colon polyp segmentation and neoplasm detectioncited by 50
- 2019Boundary and Entropy-driven Adversarial Learning for Fundus Image Segmentationcited by 46
- 2023CLUSTSEG: Clustering for Universal Segmentationcited by 32
- 2023Logic-induced Diagnostic Reasoning for Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 29
- 2023Each Test Image Deserves A Specific Prompt: Continual Test-Time Adaptation for 2D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 29
- 2022DLTTA: Dynamic Learning Rate for Test-time Adaptation on Cross-domain Medical Imagescited by 28
- 2023Clustering based Point Cloud Representation Learning for 3D Analysiscited by 23
- 2022Single-domain Generalization in Medical Image Segmentation via Test-time Adaptation from Shape Dictionarycited by 22
- 2023LOGICSEG: Parsing Visual Semantics with Neural Logic Learning and Reasoningcited by 17
- 2024Clustering Propagation for Universal Medical Image Segmentationcited by 11
- 2024Gradient Alignment Improves Test-Time Adaptation for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 11
- 2023Clustering-based Domain-Incremental Learningcited by 8
- 2024Clustering for Protein Representation Learningcited by 6
- 2025Test-Time Domain Generalization via Universe Learning: A Multi-Graph Matching Approach for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.