mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Never Saddle for Reparameterized Steepest Descent as Mirror Flow

arXiv 2603.02064 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

How does the choice of optimization algorithm shape a model's ability to learn features? To address this question for steepest descent methods --including sign descent, which is closely related to Adam --we introduce steepest mirror flows as a unifying theoretical framework. This framework reveals how optimization geometry governs learning dynamics, implicit bias, and sparsity and it provides two explanations for why Adam and AdamW often outperform SGD in fine-tuning. Focusing on diagonal linear networks and deep diagonal linear reparameterizations (a simplified proxy for attention), we show that steeper descent facilitates both saddle-point escape and feature learning. In contrast, gradient descent requires unrealistically large learning rates to escape saddles, an uncommon regime in fine-tuning. Empirically, we confirm that saddle-point escape is a central challenge in fine-tuning. Furthermore, we demonstrate that decoupled weight decay, as in AdamW, stabilizes feature learning by enforcing novel balance equations. Together, these results highlight two mechanisms how steepest descent can aid modern optimization.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2026.

Builds on

48 of 63 references.

References · 48

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 748
  3. 2019Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorizationcited by 402
  4. 2017Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorizationcited by 318
  5. 2020Kernel and Rich Regimes in Overparametrized Modelscited by 302
  6. 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 284
  7. 2018Characterizing Implicit Bias in Terms of Optimization Geometrycited by 259
  8. 2021Implicit Bias of SGD for Diagonal Linear Networks: a Provable Benefit of Stochasticitycited by 107
  9. 2022Robustness to Unbounded Smoothness of Generalized SignSGDcited by 80
  10. 2019Implicit Regularization for Optimal Sparse Recoverycited by 78
  11. 2017Gradient Descent Can Take Exponential Time to Escape Saddle Pointscited by 74
  12. 2022Gradient flow dynamics of shallow ReLU networks for square loss and orthogonal inputscited by 74
36 more
  1. 2024Modular Duality in Deep Learningcited by 71
  2. 2021On the Implicit Bias of Initialization Shape: Beyond Infinitesimal Mirror Descentcited by 69
  3. 2023Transformers as Support Vector Machinescited by 67
  4. 2024Scalable Optimization in the Modular Normcited by 64
  5. 2023Saddle-to-Saddle Dynamics in Diagonal Linear Networkscited by 54
  6. 2024From Lazy to Rich: Exact Learning Dynamics in Deep Linear Networkscited by 46
  7. 2023Abide by the Law and Follow the Flow: Conservation Laws for Gradient Flowscited by 44
  8. 2024Get rich quick: exact solutions reveal how unbalanced initializations promote rapid feature learningcited by 41
  9. 2020The Geometry of Sign Gradient Descentcited by 39
  10. 2022Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Reparametrized Models: On Equivalence to Mirror Descentcited by 38
  11. 2023(S)GD over Diagonal Linear Networks: Implicit Regularisation, Large Stepsizes and Edge of Stabilitycited by 35
  12. 2025Implicit Bias of Spectral Descent and Muon on Multiclass Separable Datacited by 33
  13. 2024The Implicit Bias of Adam on Separable Datacited by 32
  14. 2021Implicit Sparse Regularization: The Impact of Depth and Early Stoppingcited by 30
  15. 2018Hessian Riemannian gradient flows in convex programmingcited by 25
  16. 2019High-Dimensional Linear Regression via Implicit Regularizationcited by 25
  17. 2022Mirror Descent Maximizes Generalized Margin and Can Be Implemented Efficientlycited by 25
  18. 2024MicroAdam: Accurate Adaptive Optimization with Low Space Overhead and Provable Convergencecited by 19
  19. 2025Optimizers Qualitatively Alter Solutions And We Should Leverage Thiscited by 17
  20. 2022spred: Solving L1 Penalty with SGDcited by 16
  21. 2024Masks, Signs, And Learning Rate Rewindingcited by 15
  22. 2024Flavors of Margin: Implicit Bias of Steepest Descent in Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 13
  23. 2025Deep Weight Factorization: Sparse Learning Through the Lens of Artificial Symmetriescited by 13
  24. 2024Mask in the Mirror: Implicit Sparsificationcited by 12
  25. 2024Keep the Momentum: Conservation Laws beyond Euclidean Gradient Flowscited by 11
  26. 2025Mirror, Mirror of the Flow: How Does Regularization Shape Implicit Bias?cited by 10
  27. 2024Leveraging Continuous Time to Understand Momentum When Training Diagonal Linear Networkscited by 9
  28. 2024On the Optimization and Generalization of Two-layer Transformers with Sign Gradient Descentcited by 8
  29. 2025Position: Solve Layerwise Linear Models First to Understand Neural Dynamical Phenomena (Neural Collapse, Emergence, Lazy/Rich Regime, and Grokking)cited by 8
  30. 2024Implicit Bias of Mirror Flow on Separable Datacited by 7
  31. 2025Sign-In to the Lottery: Reparameterizing Sparse Training From Scratchcited by 6
  32. 2025Sparsity May Be All You Need: Sparse Random Parameter Adaptationcited by 5
  33. 2024The Price of Implicit Bias in Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 4
  34. 2024Three Mechanisms of Feature Learning in a Linear Networkcited by 3
  35. 2025Pay Attention to Small Weightscited by 3
  36. 2024A Mirror Descent Perspective of Smoothed Sign Descentcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.