mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mask in the Mirror: Implicit Sparsification

arXiv 2408.09966 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2024cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Continuous sparsification strategies are among the most effective methods for reducing the inference costs and memory demands of large-scale neural networks. A key factor in their success is the implicit L1 regularization induced by jointly learning both mask and weight variables, which has been shown experimentally to outperform explicit L1 regularization. We provide a theoretical explanation for this observation by analyzing the learning dynamics, revealing that early continuous sparsification is governed by an implicit L2 regularization that gradually transitions to an L1 penalty over time. Leveraging this insight, we propose a method to dynamically control the strength of this implicit bias. Through an extension of the mirror flow framework, we establish convergence and optimality guarantees in the context of underdetermined linear regression. Our theoretical findings may be of independent interest, as we demonstrate how to enter the rich regime and show that the implicit bias can be controlled via a time-dependent Bregman potential. To validate these insights, we introduce PILoT, a continuous sparsification approach with novel initialization and dynamic regularization, which consistently outperforms baselines in standard experiments.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 64 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2024.

Builds on

64 of 81 references.

References · 64

  1. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
  2. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  3. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  4. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
  5. 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 802
  6. 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 627
  7. 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 571
  8. 2016Learning Structured Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 538
  9. 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 526
  10. 2019Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winnerscited by 491
  11. 2020Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowcited by 475
  12. 2020Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient Flowcited by 467
38 more
  1. 2017Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorizationcited by 318
  2. 2020Kernel and Rich Regimes in Overparametrized Modelscited by 302
  3. 2020Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Wide Two-layer Neural Networks Trained with the Logistic Losscited by 267
  4. 2018Characterizing Implicit Bias in Terms of Optimization Geometrycited by 259
  5. 2021Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 242
  6. 2020Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network Pruningcited by 238
  7. 2019Sparse Networks from Scratch: Faster Training without Losing Performancecited by 210
  8. 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 200
  9. 2023Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?cited by 186
  10. 2020Pruning Neural Networks at Initialization: Why are We Missing the Mark?cited by 181
  11. 2019Drawing Early-Bird Tickets: Towards More Efficient Training of Deep Networkscited by 160
  12. 2020Soft Threshold Weight Reparameterization for Learnable Sparsitycited by 150
  13. 2021Implicit Bias of SGD for Diagonal Linear Networks: a Provable Benefit of Stochasticitycited by 107
  14. 2019Winning the Lottery with Continuous Sparsificationcited by 99
  15. 2022The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Random Pruning: Return of the Most Naive Baseline for Sparse Trainingcited by 85
  16. 2020Optimal Lottery Tickets via SubsetSum: Logarithmic Over-Parameterization is Sufficientcited by 81
  17. 2019Implicit Regularization for Optimal Sparse Recoverycited by 78
  18. 2017Gradient Descent Can Take Exponential Time to Escape Saddle Pointscited by 74
  19. 2020Logarithmic Pruning is All You Needcited by 71
  20. 2019Convergence rates for the stochastic gradient descent method for non-convex objective functionscited by 66
  21. 2021Introduction to Neural Network Verificationcited by 63
  22. 2021AC/DC: Alternating Compressed/DeCompressed Training of Deep Neural Networkscited by 58
  23. 2021Powerpropagation: A sparsity inducing weight reparameterisationcited by 49
  24. 2021Effective Sparsification of Neural Networks with Global Sparsity Constraintcited by 45
  25. 2021Stochastic gradient descent with noise of machine learning type. Part I: Discrete time analysiscited by 38
  26. 2022Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Reparametrized Models: On Equivalence to Mirror Descentcited by 38
  27. 2022Unmasking the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: What's Encoded in a Winning Ticket's Mask?cited by 38
  28. 2023Dynamic Sparse Training with Structured Sparsitycited by 36
  29. 2022Rare Gems: Finding Lottery Tickets at Initializationcited by 34
  30. 2022Pruning's Effect on Generalization Through the Lens of Training and Regularizationcited by 31
  31. 2021Implicit Sparse Regularization: The Impact of Depth and Early Stoppingcited by 30
  32. 2021Efficient Neural Network Training via Forward and Backward Propagation Sparsificationcited by 30
  33. 2021On the Existence of Universal Lottery Ticketscited by 30
  34. 2021Convergence of stochastic gradient descent schemes for Lojasiewicz-landscapescited by 27
  35. 2022Why Random Pruning Is All We Need to Start Sparsecited by 26
  36. 2018Hessian Riemannian gradient flows in convex programmingcited by 25
  37. 2019High-Dimensional Linear Regression via Implicit Regularizationcited by 25
  38. 2022Controlled Sparsity via Constrained Optimization or: How I Learned to Stop Tuning Penalties and Love Constraintscited by 25

50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 6.

12 papers.