Sparsity May Be All You Need: Sparse Random Parameter Adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Full fine-tuning of large language models for alignment and task adaptation has become prohibitively expensive as models have grown in size. Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods aim at significantly reducing the computational and memory resources needed for fine-tuning these models by only training on a small number of parameters instead of all model parameters. Currently, the most popular PEFT method is the Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), which freezes the parameters of the model and introduces a small set of trainable parameters in the form of low-rank matrices. We propose simply reducing the number of trainable parameters by randomly selecting a small proportion of the model parameters to train on, while fixing all other parameters, without any additional prior assumptions such as low-rank structures. In this paper, we compare the efficiency and performance of our proposed approach to other PEFT methods as well as full parameter fine-tuning. We find our method to be competitive with LoRA when using a similar number of trainable parameters. Our findings suggest that what truly matters for a PEFT technique to perform well is not necessarily the specific adapter structure, but rather the number of trainable parameters being used.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2025.
Builds on
16 of 30 references.
References · 16
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
- 2024DoRA: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 740
- 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 679
- 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 613
- 2023VeRA: Vector-based Random Matrix Adaptationcited by 294
4 more
- 2021Composable Sparse Fine-Tuning for Cross-Lingual Transfercited by 144
- 2024Modular Pluralism: Pluralistic Alignment via Multi-LLM Collaborationcited by 111
- 2023Sparsity May Cry: Let Us Fail (Current) Sparse Neural Networks Together!cited by 27
- 2024DARE the Extreme: Revisiting Delta-Parameter Pruning For Fine-Tuned Modelscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025PLM: Efficient Peripheral Language Models Hardware-Co-Designed for Ubiquitous Computingcited by 4
- 2025Pay Attention to Small Weightscited by 3
- 2025DiaBlo: Diagonal Blocks Are Sufficient For Finetuningcited by 2
- 2026Never Saddle for Reparameterized Steepest Descent as Mirror Flowcited by 2
- 2026Understanding LLM Parameter Update Sparsity through the Lens of Fishercited by 0
- 2026Understanding LLM Parameter Update Sparsity through the Lens of Fisher28 Sep 2026
- 2026Never Saddle for Reparameterized Steepest Descent as Mirror Flow2 Mar 2026
- 2025Pay Attention to Small Weights26 Jun 2025
- 2025DiaBlo: Diagonal Blocks Are Sufficient For Finetuning3 Jun 2025
- 2025PLM: Efficient Peripheral Language Models Hardware-Co-Designed for Ubiquitous Computing15 Mar 2025