mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Geometry of Sign Gradient Descent

arXiv 2002.08056 ↗First posted 19 Feb 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 41

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sign-based optimization methods have become popular in machine learning due to their favorable communication cost in distributed optimization and their surprisingly good performance in neural network training. Furthermore, they are closely connected to so-called adaptive gradient methods like Adam. Recent works on signSGD have used a non-standard "separable smoothness" assumption, whereas some older works study sign gradient descent as steepest descent with respect to the ℓ_∞-norm. In this work, we unify these existing results by showing a close connection between separable smoothness and ℓ_∞-smoothness and argue that the latter is the weaker and more natural assumption. We then proceed to study the smoothness constant with respect to the ℓ_∞-norm and thereby isolate geometric properties of the objective function which affect the performance of sign-based methods. In short, we find sign-based methods to be preferable over gradient descent if (i) the Hessian is to some degree concentrated on its diagonal, and (ii) its maximal eigenvalue is much larger than the average eigenvalue. Both properties are common in deep networks.

Key facts. Cited by 41 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 10; 2025: 9; 2026: 13.

41 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Training Deep Learning Models with Norm-Constrained LMOscited by 192
  2. 2023Noise Is Not the Main Factor Behind the Gap Between SGD and Adam on Transformers, but Sign Descent Might Becited by 114
  3. 2024Heavy-Tailed Class Imbalance and Why Adam Outperforms Gradient Descent on Language Modelscited by 80
  4. 2025Gluon: Making Muon & Scion Great Again! (Bridging Theory and Practice of LMO-based Optimizers for LLMs)cited by 72
  5. 2024A New Perspective on Shampoo's Preconditionercited by 59
  6. 2021Hard to Forget: Poisoning Attacks on Certified Machine Unlearningcited by 52
  7. 2023Optimize Weight Rounding via Signed Gradient Descent for the Quantization of LLMscited by 50
  8. 2024Deconstructing What Makes a Good Optimizer for Language Modelscited by 41
  9. 2024The Implicit Bias of Adam on Separable Datacited by 36
  10. 2023On the Implicit Bias of Adamcited by 27
  11. 2025Scaling Laws for Gradient Descent and Sign Descent for Linear Bigram Models under Zipf's Lawcited by 24
  12. 2021Revealing and Protecting Labels in Distributed Trainingcited by 17
29 more
  1. 2025Generalized Gradient Norm Clipping & Non-Euclidean (L0,L1)-Smoothnesscited by 17
  2. 2022Nonlinear gradient mappings and stochastic optimization: A general framework with applications to heavy-tail noisecited by 16
  3. 2024Understanding Adam Requires Better Rotation Dependent Assumptionscited by 11
  4. 2024FRUGAL: Memory-Efficient Optimization by Reducing State Overhead for Scalable Trainingcited by 10
  5. 2026Clarifying Shampoo: Adapting Spectral Descent to Stochasticity and the Parameter Trajectorycited by 8
  6. 2023SignSVRG: fixing SignSGD via variance reductioncited by 7
  7. 2024Exact Risk Curves of signSGD in High-Dimensions: Quantifying Preconditioning and Noise-Compression Effectscited by 7
  8. 2021On Faster Convergence of Scaled Sign Gradient Descentcited by 6
  9. 2026Muown: Row-Norm Control for Muon Optimizationcited by 6
  10. 2024Revisiting Scalable Hessian Diagonal Approximations for Applications in Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
  11. 2025LoTA-QAF: Lossless Ternary Adaptation for Quantization-Aware Fine-Tuningcited by 5
  12. 2025A Tale of Two Geometries: Adaptive Optimizers and Non-Euclidean Descentcited by 5
  13. 2026Optimizer-Model Consistency: Full Finetuning with the Same Optimizer as Pretraining Forgets Lesscited by 5
  14. 2025Non-Euclidean Broximal Point Method: A Blueprint for Geometry-Aware Optimizationcited by 4
  15. 2026Never Saddle for Reparameterized Steepest Descent as Mirror Flowcited by 4
  16. 2024A Mirror Descent Perspective of Smoothed Sign Descentcited by 3
  17. 2025Stacey: Promoting Stochastic Steepest Descent via Accelerated ℓp-Smooth Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 3
  18. 2025Per-example gradients: a new frontier for understanding and improving optimizerscited by 2
  19. 2026Adaptive Batch Sizes Using Non-Euclidean Gradient Noise Scales for Stochastic Sign and Spectral Descentcited by 2
  20. 2026A unified convergence theory for adaptive first-order methods in the nonconvex case, including AdaNorm, full and diagonal AdaGrad and Muoncited by 2
  21. 2026When and Why SignSGD Outperforms SGD: A Theoretical Study Based on ℓ1-norm Lower Boundscited by 2
  22. 2026Free Heavy-Tailed Lunch for Muon: A Theoretical Justification of Empirical Successcited by 2
  23. 2024Faster Acceleration for Steepest Descentcited by 1
  24. 2026Open Problem: Is AdamW Effective Under Heavy-Tailed Noise?cited by 1
  25. 2023On Neural Network approximation of ideal adversarial attack and convergence of adversarial trainingcited by 0
  26. 2026Beyond ℓ2-norm and ℓ_∞-norm: A Curvature-Inspired ℓp-Norm Scheme for Deep Neural Networkscited by 0
  27. 2026Zero-order Parameter-free Optimization for LMO-based Methods: Novel Approach for Efficient Fine-tuningcited by 0
  28. 2026From Parallel to Sequential: Small-Batch Noise Restores Simplicity Bias of Muoncited by 0
  29. 2026Which Geometry on Which Layer? Measured Sign-Spectral Assignment in Mixed-Optimizer Trainingcited by 0