mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learn Hard Problems During RL with Reference Guided Fine-tuning

arXiv 2603.01223 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 12

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) for mathematical reasoning can suffer from reward sparsity: for challenging problems, LLM fails to sample any correct trajectories, preventing RL from receiving meaningful positive feedback. At the same time, there often exist human-written reference solutions along with the problem (e.g., problems from AoPS), but directly fine-tuning on these solutions offers no benefit because models often cannot imitate human proofs that lie outside their own reasoning distribution. We introduce Reference-Guided Fine-Tuning (ReGFT), a simple and effective method that utilizes human-written reference solutions to synthesize positive trajectories on hard problems and train on them before RL. For each problem, we provide the model with a partial reference solution and let it generate its own reasoning trace, ensuring the resulting trajectories remain in the model's reasoning space while still benefiting from reference guidance. Fine-tuning on these reference-guided trajectories increases the number of solvable problems and produces a checkpoint that receives more positive rewards during RL. Across three benchmarks (AIME24, AIME25, BeyondAIME), ReGFT consistently improves supervised accuracy, accelerates DAPO training, and raises the final performance plateau of RL. Our results show that ReGFT effectively overcomes reward sparsity and unlocks stronger RL-based mathematical reasoning.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2026.

Builds on

17 of 21 references.

Closest ancestors · 13

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025On the Interplay of Pre-Training, Mid-Training, and RL on Reasoning Language Models8 Dec
  2. 2025Nudging the Boundaries of LLM Reasoning30 Sep
  3. 2025Depth-Breadth Synergy in RLVR: Unlocking LLM Reasoning Gains with Adaptive Exploration19 Aug
  4. 2025QuestA: Expanding Reasoning Capacity in LLMs via Question Augmentation17 Jul
  5. 2025SRFT: A Single-Stage Method with Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoning24 Jun
  6. 2025BREAD: Branched Rollouts from Expert Anchors Bridge SFT & RL for Reasoning20 Jun
  7. 2025Spurious Rewards: Rethinking Training Signals in RLVR12 Jun
  8. 2025Reinforcement Learning Teachers of Test Time Scaling10 Jun
  9. 2025Learning What Reinforcement Learning Can't: Interleaved Online Fine-Tuning for Hardest Questions9 Jun
  10. 2025ProRL: Prolonged Reinforcement Learning Expands Reasoning Boundaries in Large Language Models30 May
  11. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?18 Apr
  12. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
1 more
  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul

Other references · 4

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
  3. 2025The Invisible Leash: Why RLVR May or May Not Escape Its Origincited by 97
  4. 2025Knapsack RL: Unlocking Exploration of LLMs via Optimizing Budget Allocationcited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 12.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Echo Chamber: RL Post-training Amplifies Behaviors Learned in Pretraining
  2. 2025NFT: Bridging Supervised Learning and Reinforcement Learning in Math Reasoning
  3. 2026Offline Exploration-Aware Fine-Tuning for Long-Chain Mathematical Reasoning
  4. 2026Provable Benefits of RLVR over SFT for Reasoning Models: Learning to Backtrack Efficiently
  5. 2025No Free Lunch: Rethinking Internal Feedback for LLM Reasoning
  6. 2024Teaching Large Language Models to Reason with Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2025Unleashing the Reasoning Potential of Pre-trained LLMs by Critique Fine-Tuning on One Problem
  8. 2025Revisiting Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning from A Cross-Domain Perspective