mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unleashing the Reasoning Potential of Pre-trained LLMs by Critique Fine-Tuning on One Problem

arXiv 2506.03295 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2025cs.CL cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

We have witnessed that strong LLMs like Qwen-Math, MiMo, and Phi-4 possess immense reasoning potential inherited from the pre-training stage. With reinforcement learning (RL), these models can improve dramatically on reasoning tasks. Recent studies have shown that even RL on a single problem can unleash these models' reasoning capabilities. However, RL is not only expensive but also unstable. Even one-shot RL requires hundreds of GPU hours. This raises a critical question: Is there a more efficient way to unleash the reasoning potential of these powerful base LLMs? In this work, we demonstrate that Critique Fine-Tuning (CFT) on only one problem can effectively unleash the reasoning potential of LLMs. Our method constructs critique data by collecting diverse model-generated solutions to a single problem and using teacher LLMs to provide detailed critiques. We fine-tune Qwen and Llama family models, ranging from 1.5B to 14B parameters, on the CFT data and observe significant performance gains across diverse reasoning tasks. For example, with just 5 GPU hours of training, Qwen-Math-7B-CFT show an average improvement of 15% on six math benchmarks and 16% on three logic reasoning benchmarks. These results are comparable to or even surpass the results from RL with 20x less compute. Ablation studies reveal the robustness of one-shot CFT across different prompt problems. These results highlight one-shot CFT as a simple, general, and compute-efficient approach to unleashing the reasoning capabilities of modern LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2025.

Builds on

21 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All Domains20 May
  2. 2025MiMo: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of Language Model -- From Pretraining to Posttraining12 May
  3. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Example29 Apr
  4. 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wild24 Mar
  5. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Small LLMs: What Works and What Doesn't20 Mar
  6. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan

Other references · 15

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  5. 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,341
  6. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
  7. 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
  8. 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 498
  9. 2025Phi-4-reasoning Technical Reportcited by 151
  10. 2025BIG-Bench Extra Hardcited by 125
  11. 2025A Sober Look at Progress in Language Model Reasoning: Pitfalls and Paths to Reproducibilitycited by 93
  12. 2025SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation across 285 Graduate Disciplinescited by 79
3 more
  1. 2024AceMath: Advancing Frontier Math Reasoning with Post-Training and Reward Modelingcited by 77
  2. 2020Transient Non-Stationarity and Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 75
  3. 2025Critique Fine-Tuning: Learning to Critique is More Effective than Learning to Imitatecited by 63

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Revisiting Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning from A Cross-Domain Perspective
  2. 2025Does Math Reasoning Improve General LLM Capabilities? Understanding Transferability of LLM Reasoning
  3. 2025How Far Are We from Optimal Reasoning Efficiency?
  4. 2025Critique-GRPO: Advancing LLM Reasoning with Natural Language and Numerical Feedback
  5. 2025Boosting Accuracy and Efficiency of Budget Forcing in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical Reasoning
  6. 2025RL Squeezes, SFT Expands: A Comparative Study of Reasoning LLMs
  7. 2025Learning What Reinforcement Learning Can't: Interleaved Online Fine-Tuning for Hardest Questions
  8. 2025How and Why LLMs Generalize: A Fine-Grained Analysis of LLM Reasoning from Cognitive Behaviors to Low-Level Patterns