Hide to Guide: Learning via Semantic Masking
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a powerful paradigm for improving language models on reasoning-intensive tasks, but its effectiveness is often limited by exploration. For example, models often fail on hard problems, leaving little useful reward signal. External expert traces offer a natural source of guidance, yet they may also expose reward-relevant content along the critical path to the verifier target, such as final answers, intermediate values, executable implementations, or answer-related entities. This content can create an unintended reward hacking channel, allowing the policy to obtain reward by copying the trace rather than learning the underlying reasoning or agentic behavior. Existing guided-RL methods reduce this risk by using partial trajectories, but they mainly control how much expert information is shown heuristically rather than which parts should be hidden. To this end, we propose Semantic Masked Expert Policy Optimization (SMEPO), a fine-grained semantic masking strategy for expert-guided RLVR. Instead of truncating traces coarsely or revealing them unchanged, SMEPO masks reward-relevant semantic spans along the critical path while preserving the expert's decomposition, plan, and procedural structure. This turns hard problems from reasoning from scratch into a fill-in-the-blank process: the policy can follow the expert's problem-solving route, but must still reconstruct the missing values, code, or entities by itself. SMEPO is simple to apply and requires no changes to the reward function or RL objective. Across diverse domains, including math, code, and agentic search, SMEPO improves accuracy by up to 3.2 points over GRPO and reduces training time by up to 4.2x. The code is available at https://github.com/mit-han-lab/SMEPO.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 31 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2026.
Builds on
31 of 61 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Learn Hard Problems During RL with Reference Guided Fine-tuning1 Mar
- 2026POPE: Learning to Reason on Hard Problems via Privileged On-Policy Exploration26 Jan
- 2025Learning Like Humans: Advancing LLM Reasoning Capabilities via Adaptive Difficulty Curriculum Learning and Expert-Guided Self-Reformulation13 May
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Example29 Apr
- 2025Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidance21 Apr
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective26 Mar
- 2025REINFORCE++: Stabilizing Critic-Free Policy Optimization with Global Advantage Normalization4 Jan
Other references · 24
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
- 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,444
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
- 2024DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligencecited by 1,181
12 more
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,136
- 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
- 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 723
- 2019MASS: Masked Sequence to Sequence Pre-training for Language Generationcited by 347
- 2024DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligencecited by 331
- 2025DeepResearcher: Scaling Deep Research via Reinforcement Learning in Real-world Environmentscited by 286
- 2022Efficient Training of Language Models to Fill in the Middlecited by 255
- 2019Reward Tampering Problems and Solutions in Reinforcement Learning: A Causal Influence Diagram Perspectivecited by 108
- 2023GLiNER: Generalist Model for Named Entity Recognition using Bidirectional Transformercited by 88
- 2025MiroThinker: Pushing the Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Research Agents via Model, Context, and Interactive Scalingcited by 81
- 2024Evaluation of LLMs on Syntax-Aware Code Fill-in-the-Middle Taskscited by 25
- 2025Structure-Aware Fill-in-the-Middle Pretraining for Codecited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Selective Expert Guidance for Effective and Diverse Exploration in Reinforcement Learning of LLMs
- 2026From RLVR to RLSVR: Task Transformation Induces Self-Verifiable Rewards for Open-Ended LLM Self-Improvement
- 2026Decoupling Exploration from Optimization in RLVR
- 2026SAGE: Shaping Anchors for Guided Exploration in RLVR of LLMs
- 2026Learning from Failures: Correction-Oriented Policy Optimization with Verifiable Rewards
- 2025Low-probability Tokens Sustain Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward
- 2025The Reasoning Boundary Paradox: How Reinforcement Learning Constrains Language Models
- 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifiers