Learning under Label Noise through Few-Shot Human-in-the-Loop Refinement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Wearable technologies enable continuous monitoring of various health metrics, such as physical activity, heart rate, sleep, and stress levels. A key challenge with wearable data is obtaining quality labels. Unlike modalities like video where the videos themselves can be effectively used to label objects or events, wearable data do not contain obvious cues about the physical manifestation of the users and usually require rich metadata. As a result, label noise can become an increasingly thorny issue when labeling such data. In this paper, we propose a novel solution to address noisy label learning, entitled Few-Shot Human-in-the-Loop Refinement (FHLR). Our method initially learns a seed model using weak labels. Next, it fine-tunes the seed model using a handful of expert corrections. Finally, it achieves better generalizability and robustness by merging the seed and fine-tuned models via weighted parameter averaging. We evaluate our approach on four challenging tasks and datasets, and compare it against eight competitive baselines designed to deal with noisy labels. We show that FHLR achieves significantly better performance when learning from noisy labels and achieves state-of-the-art by a large margin, with up to 19% accuracy improvement under symmetric and asymmetric noise. Notably, we find that FHLR is particularly robust to increased label noise, unlike prior works that suffer from severe performance degradation. Our work not only achieves better generalization in high-stakes health sensing benchmarks but also sheds light on how noise affects commonly-used models.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2024.
Builds on
18 of 36 references.
References · 18
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 675
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
- 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 621
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
- 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
- 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
- 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 161
6 more
- 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
- 2017Learning From Noisy Large-Scale Datasets With Minimal Supervisioncited by 115
- 2019Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learningcited by 108
- 2020AdvAug: Robust Adversarial Augmentation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 67
- 2022PolyLoss: A Polynomial Expansion Perspective of Classification Loss Functionscited by 63
- 2019Robust Bi-Tempered Logistic Loss Based on Bregman Divergencescited by 61
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Diffusion-Based Electrocardiography Noise Quantification via Anomaly Detectioncited by 1
- 2024I-MPN: Inductive Message Passing Network for Efficient Human-in-the-Loop Annotation of Mobile Eye Tracking Datacited by 0
- 2026Loss Knows Best: Detecting Annotation Errors in Videos via Loss Trajectoriescited by 0
- 2026Loss Knows Best: Detecting Annotation Errors in Videos via Loss Trajectories16 Feb 2026
- 2025Diffusion-Based Electrocardiography Noise Quantification via Anomaly Detection13 Jun 2025
- 2024I-MPN: Inductive Message Passing Network for Efficient Human-in-the-Loop Annotation of Mobile Eye Tracking Data10 Jun 2024