MILD: Multi-Intent Learning and Disambiguation for Proactive Failure Prediction in Intent-based Networking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In multi-intent intent-based networks, a single fault can trigger co-drift where multiple intents exhibit symptomatic KPI degradation, creating ambiguity about the true root-cause intent. We present MILD, a proactive framework that reformulates intent assurance from reactive drift detection to fixed-horizon failure prediction with intent-level disambiguation. MILD uses a teacher-augmented Mixture-of-Experts where a gated disambiguation module identifies the root-cause intent while per-intent heads output calibrated risk scores. On a benchmark with non-linear failures and co-drifts, MILD provides 3.8%--92.5% longer remediation lead time and improves intent-level root-cause disambiguation accuracy by 9.4%--45.8% over baselines. MILD also provides per-alert KPI explanations, enabling actionable diagnosis.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2026.
Builds on
10 of 30 references.
References · 10
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2015Reducing Overfitting in Deep Networks by Decorrelating Representationscited by 94
- 2021Anomaly Detection and Failure Root Cause Analysis in (Micro)Service-Based Cloud Applications: A Surveycited by 48
- 2024Deep Learning for Multi-Label Learning: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 19
- 2024Intent Assurance using LLMs guided by Intent Driftcited by 13
- 2022Towards Supporting Intelligence in 5G/6G Core Networks: NWDAF Implementation and Initial Analysiscited by 7
- 2024Telecom Foundation Models: Applications, Challenges, and Future Trendscited by 6
- 2025NetIntent: Leveraging Large Language Models for End-to-End Intent-Based SDN Automationcited by 6
- 2025Towards NWDAF-enabled Analytics and Closed-Loop Automation in 5G Networkscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026AI-driven Intent-Based Networking Approach for Self-configuration of Next Generation Networkscited by 1
- 2026Untangling Co-Drift: Proactive Multi-Intent Failure Prediction and Root-Cause Disambiguation for Self-Driving Networkscited by 0
- 2026SoK: Semantic Decision Engines in Network Control Loopscited by 0
- 2026SoK: Semantic Decision Engines in Network Control Loops5 Oct 2026
- 2026Untangling Co-Drift: Proactive Multi-Intent Failure Prediction and Root-Cause Disambiguation for Self-Driving Networks28 Jul 2026
- 2026AI-driven Intent-Based Networking Approach for Self-configuration of Next Generation Networks24 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Paved with True Intents: Intent-Aware Training Improves LLM Safety Classification Across Training Regimes
- 2026When Evidence is Sparse: Weakly Supervised Early Failure Alerting in Dialogs and LLM-Agent Trajectories
- 2026SADE: Symptom-Aware Diagnostic Escalation for LLM-Based Network Troubleshooting
- 2026FaulT-Bench: Towards Benchmarking Network Troubleshooting LLM Agents under Unreliable User Tickets
- 2026Intent2Tc: Automated Intent-to-Traffic Control Translation with Language Models
- 2026Tri-Info: Generalizable, Interpretable Failure Prediction for VLA Models via Information Theory
- 2026Vision Language Models for Optimization-Driven Intent Processing in Autonomous Networks
- 2026Same Outcome, Different Evidence: Intent Recovery in LLM Safety Evaluation