mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Intent2Tc: Automated Intent-to-Traffic Control Translation with Language Models

arXiv 2609.31397 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2026cs.NI cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated and highly usable Quality-of-Service (QoS) enforcement requires translating high-level service intents into deployable traffic-management policies. Although intent-based networking (IBN) has simplified policy specification, bridging the gap between business-level intents and executable network configurations remains complex, error-prone, and difficult to automate. This paper presents Intent2Tc, a closed-loop language-model-driven framework that translates business-level traffic-shaping intents into declarative sub-intents and subsequently into validated, executable Linux traffic control (tc) configurations. The framework integrates an Active Queue Management (AQM)-based digital twin (DT) semantic model, automated metadata extraction, critique-driven refinement, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based knowledge reuse to improve semantic consistency and configuration reliability. We evaluate multiple open-source large language models (LLMs) and small language models (SLMs), together with Claude Sonnet-4.6, on 100 Request for Comments (RFC) 9315-compliant traffic-shaping intents. Across both translation stages, Intent2Tc achieves high semantic fidelity, configuration accuracy, and deployment readiness, with Claude Sonnet-4.6 reaching 0.98 semantic similarity, 1.0 semantic unit coverage, and 0.045 normalized edit distance. Furthermore, RAG reduces token consumption and inference latency while enabling compact models such as Phi-4-mini to approach the performance of substantially larger models. Linux tc serves as the target configuration platform, demonstrating the practical applicability of the proposed framework.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.

Builds on

8 of 20 references.

References · 8

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  2. 2020Few-shot Natural Language Generation for Task-Oriented Dialogcited by 89
  3. 2024LLM-based policy generation for intent-based management of applicationscited by 13
  4. 2025Intent-Based Network for RAN Management with Large Language Modelscited by 7
  5. 2025NetIntent: Leveraging Large Language Models for End-to-End Intent-Based SDN Automationcited by 6
  6. 2025INTA: Intent-Based Translation for Network Configuration with LLM Agentscited by 5
  7. 2025Towards End-to-End Network Intent Management with Large Language Modelscited by 4
  8. 2026Intent2QoS: Language Model-Driven Automation of Traffic Shaping Configurationscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026NetInspector: Measuring and Improving LLM Capabilities for Reliable Intent-Based Networking Policy Generation ↗
  2. 2025RAG-Enabled Intent Reasoning for Application-Network Interaction
  3. 2025Bridging Language Models and Formal Methods for Intent-Driven Optical Network Design
  4. 2026Vision Language Models for Optimization-Driven Intent Processing in Autonomous Networks
  5. 2026PCAP-LM: An LLM-Native Text Representation for TLS Bulk Traffic Analysis
  6. 2026IntAgent: NWDAF-Based Intent LLM Agent Towards Advanced Next Generation Networks
  7. 2025iServe: An Intent-based Serving System for LLMs
  8. 2026NDT Factory: Synthesizing Verified Network Digital Twins from Semantic Models via Multi-Agent LLM