mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Intent Assurance using LLMs guided by Intent Drift

arXiv 2402.00715 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2024cs.AI cs.NI stat.MEcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Intent-Based Networking (IBN) presents a paradigm shift for network management, by promising to align intents and business objectives with network operations--in an automated manner. However, its practical realization is challenging: 1) processing intents, i.e., translate, decompose and identify the logic to fulfill the intent, and 2) intent conformance, that is, considering dynamic networks, the logic should be adequately adapted to assure intents. To address the latter, intent assurance is tasked with continuous verification and validation, including taking the necessary actions to align the operational and target states. In this paper, we define an assurance framework that allows us to detect and act when intent drift occurs. To do so, we leverage AI-driven policies, generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) which can quickly learn the necessary in-context requirements, and assist with the fulfillment and assurance of intents.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2024.

Builds on

3 of 20 references.

References · 3

  1. 2024LLM-based policy generation for intent-based management of applicationscited by 13
  2. 2022End-to-End Quality-of-Service Assurance with Autonomous Systems: 5G/6G Case Studycited by 2
  3. 2022Multi-agent reinforcement learning for intent-based service assurance in cellular networkscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 7.

12 papers.