Vision Language Models for Optimization-Driven Intent Processing in Autonomous Networks
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models
Abstract (arXiv)
Intent-Based Networking (IBN) allows operators to specify high-level network goals rather than low-level configurations. While recent work demonstrates that large language models can automate configuration tasks, a distinct class of intents requires generating optimization code to compute provably optimal solutions for traffic engineering, routing, and resource allocation. Current systems assume text-based intent expression, requiring operators to enumerate topologies and parameters in prose. Network practitioners naturally reason about structure through diagrams, yet whether Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can process annotated network sketches into correct optimization code remains unexplored. We present IntentOpt, a benchmark of 85 optimization problems across 17 categories, evaluating four VLMs (GPT-5-Mini, Claude-Haiku-4.5, Gemini-2.5-Flash, Llama-3.2-11B-Vision) under three prompting strategies on multimodal versus text-only inputs. Our evaluation shows that visual parameter extraction reduces execution success by 12-21 percentage points (pp), with GPT-5-Mini dropping from 93% to 72%. Program-of-thought prompting decreases performance by up to 13 pp, and open-source models lag behind closed-source ones, with Llama-3.2-11B-Vision reaching 18% compared to 75% for GPT-5-Mini. These results establish baseline capabilities and limitations of current VLMs for optimization code generation within an IBN system. We also demonstrate practical feasibility through a case study that deploys VLM-generated code to network testbed infrastructure using Model Context Protocol.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 4 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2026.
Builds on
4 of 11 references.
References · 4
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
- 2024Towards Intent-Based Network Management: Large Language Models for Intent Extraction in 5G Core Networkscited by 15
- 2025Towards End-to-End Network Intent Management with Large Language Modelscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026From Intents to Actions: Agentic AI in Autonomous Networks
- 2026VECTOR-Drive: Tightly Coupled Vision-Language and Trajectory Expert Routing for End-to-End Autonomous Driving
- 2026Depth-Wise Probing and Pruning of the Planning Token in a Driving Vision-Language-Action Model
- 2026Rethinking Language's Role in Efficient VLA for Autonomous Vehicles: Toward Smarter, Trustworthy Driving
- 2026StarVLA-α: Reducing Complexity in Vision-Language-Action Systems
- 2026BLUE: Toward Better Language Use in Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving
- 2026NetInspector: Measuring and Improving LLM Capabilities for Reliable Intent-Based Networking Policy Generation ↗
- 2026PAPO-VLA: Planning-Aware Policy Optimization for Vision-Language-Action Models