mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Observer Effect in World Models: Invasive Adaptation Corrupts Latent Physics

arXiv 2602.12218 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: World models → Latent predictive world models

Abstract (arXiv)

Determining whether neural models internalize physical laws as world models, rather than exploiting statistical shortcuts, remains challenging, especially under out-of-distribution (OOD) shifts. Standard evaluations often test latent capability via downstream adaptation (e.g., fine-tuning or high-capacity probes), but such interventions can change the representations being measured and thus confound what was learned during self-supervised learning (SSL). We propose a non-invasive evaluation protocol, PhyIP. We test whether physical quantities are linearly decodable from frozen representations, motivated by the linear representation hypothesis. Across fluid dynamics and orbital mechanics, we find that when SSL achieves low error, latent structure becomes linearly accessible. PhyIP recovers internal energy and Newtonian inverse-square scaling on OOD tests (e.g., ρ > 0.90). In contrast, adaptation-based evaluations can collapse this structure (ρ ≈ 0.05). These findings suggest that adaptation-based evaluation can obscure latent structures and that low-capacity probes offer a more accurate evaluation of physical world models.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Latent predictive world models, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 40 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2026.

Builds on

40 of 56 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026From Kepler to Newton: Inductive Biases Guide Learned World Models in Transformers6 Feb

Other references · 39

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  3. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  4. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  5. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  6. 2018World Modelscited by 1,513
  7. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,492
  8. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
  9. 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
  10. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
  11. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  12. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
27 more
  1. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 712
  2. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
  3. 2015Causal inference using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervalscited by 536
  4. 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 422
  5. 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 398
  6. 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 381
  7. 2017Stable Architectures for Deep Neural Networkscited by 341
  8. 2023Emergent Linear Representations in World Models of Self-Supervised Sequence Modelscited by 319
  9. 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Stylecited by 312
  10. 2021Contrastive Learning Inverts the Data Generating Processcited by 221
  11. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 203
  12. 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 192
  13. 2020Understanding How Dimension Reduction Tools Work: An Empirical Approach to Deciphering t-SNE, UMAP, TriMAP, and PaCMAP for Data Visualizationcited by 173
  14. 2025Do generative video models understand physical principles?cited by 161
  15. 2024Evaluating the World Model Implicit in a Generative Modelcited by 113
  16. 2021Learned Coarse Models for Efficient Turbulence Simulationcited by 91
  17. 2025What Has a Foundation Model Found? Using Inductive Bias to Probe for World Modelscited by 47
  18. 2025AI-Generated Video Detection via Perceptual Straighteningcited by 34
  19. 2025Next-Latent Prediction Transformers Learn Compact World Modelscited by 31
  20. 2024Fine-Tuning is Fine, if Calibratedcited by 24
  21. 2023A Closer Look at Model Adaptation using Feature Distortion and Simplicity Biascited by 20
  22. 2025Flow Density Control: Generative Optimization Beyond Entropy-Regularized Fine-Tuningcited by 17
  23. 2025From superposition to sparse codes: interpretable representations in neural networkscited by 16
  24. 2024Transformers Use Causal World Models in Maze-Solving Taskscited by 13
  25. 2025Position: An Empirically Grounded Identifiability Theory Will Accelerate Self-Supervised Learning Researchcited by 9
  26. 2023Surrogate Modeling for Computationally Expensive Simulations of Supernovae in High-Resolution Galaxy Simulationscited by 6
  27. 2025Exploratory Causal Inference in SAEncecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026What Can Latent World Models Know? Physical Parameter Identifiability in Multimodal Predictive Representations
  2. 2026Sparse probes and murky physics: a case study of interpretability challenges in a foundation model for continuum dynamics
  3. 2026When Do Conservation Laws Survive Learned Representations? Certified Horizons for Latent World Models
  4. 2025Uncovering Spontaneous Physics Representations in In-Context Learning
  5. 2026World Models' Last Exam in Physics
  6. 2026Correcting a learned physical invariant improves world-model rollouts
  7. 2026Stable and Counterfactually Robust Physical World Models from Imposed Structure and Learned Physics
  8. 2025Four Principles for Physically Interpretable World Models