From superposition to sparse codes: interpretable representations in neural networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding how information is represented in neural networks is a fundamental challenge in both neuroscience and artificial intelligence. Despite their nonlinear architectures, recent evidence suggests that neural networks encode features in superposition, meaning that input concepts are linearly overlaid within the network's representations. We present a perspective that explains this phenomenon and provides a foundation for extracting interpretable representations from neural activations. Our theoretical framework consists of three steps: (1) Identifiability theory shows that neural networks trained for classification recover latent features up to a linear transformation. (2) Sparse coding methods can extract disentangled features from these representations by leveraging principles from compressed sensing. (3) Quantitative interpretability metrics provide a means to assess the success of these methods, ensuring that extracted features align with human-interpretable concepts. By bridging insights from theoretical neuroscience, representation learning, and interpretability research, we propose an emerging perspective on understanding neural representations in both artificial and biological systems. Our arguments have implications for neural coding theories, AI transparency, and the broader goal of making deep learning models more interpretable.
Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 142 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2025.
Builds on
57 of 142 references.
References · 57
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 4,053
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
38 more
- 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
- 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 503
- 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 382
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 300
- 2018Towards a Definition of Disentangled Representationscited by 296
- 2018Nonlinear ICA Using Auxiliary Variables and Generalized Contrastive Learningcited by 282
- 2016Unsupervised Feature Extraction by Time-Contrastive Learning and Nonlinear ICAcited by 273
- 2021Contrastive Learning Inverts the Data Generating Processcited by 221
- 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoderscited by 179
- 2016Linear Algebraic Structure of Word Senses, with Applications to Polysemycited by 165
- 2024The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Modelscited by 159
- 2020Towards Nonlinear Disentanglement in Natural Data with Temporal Sparse Codingcited by 122
- 2021Transformer visualization via dictionary learning: contextualized embedding as a linear superposition of transformer factorscited by 108
- 2023How do Language Models Bind Entities in Context?cited by 108
- 2020ICE-BeeM: Identifiable Conditional Energy-Based Deep Models Based on Nonlinear ICAcited by 102
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Featurescited by 93
- 2020On Interpretability of Artificial Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 88
- 2024Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptationcited by 68
- 2024InterPLM: Discovering Interpretable Features in Protein Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 66
- 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignmentcited by 62
- 2023Identifiability of latent-variable and structural-equation models: from linear to nonlinearcited by 58
- 2017SPINE: SParse Interpretable Neural Embeddingscited by 55
- 2020Towards falsifiable interpretability researchcited by 53
- 2015Sparse Overcomplete Word Vector Representationscited by 44
- 2022Synergies between Disentanglement and Sparsity: Generalization and Identifiability in Multi-Task Learningcited by 44
- 2024Monitoring Latent World States in Language Models with Propositional Probescited by 43
- 2024InfoNCE: Identifying the Gap Between Theory and Practicecited by 40
- 2019Learning From Brains How to Regularize Machinescited by 38
- 2024A Sparsity Principle for Partially Observable Causal Representation Learningcited by 35
- 2023Generalizing Nonlinear ICA Beyond Structural Sparsitycited by 34
- 2024Cross-Entropy Is All You Need To Invert the Data Generating Processcited by 31
- 2020Disentangling by Subspace Diffusioncited by 28
- 2024Quantifying Feature Space Universality Across Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 27
- 2016HyperLex: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Graded Lexical Entailmentcited by 26
- 2017Eigen-Distortions of Hierarchical Representationscited by 26
- 2023Interpretability Illusions in the Generalization of Simplified Modelscited by 25
- 2020Independent Innovation Analysis for Nonlinear Vector Autoregressive Processcited by 19
- 2024Compute Optimal Inference and Provable Amortisation Gap in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 18
50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 11.
16 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?cited by 31
- 2026When Does LeJEPA Learn a World Model?cited by 30
- 2026Stop Probing, Start Coding: Why Linear Probes and Sparse Autoencoders Fail at Compositional Generalisationcited by 6
- 2025Evaluating SAE interpretability without explanationscited by 5
- 2026Structuring Sparsity: Block-Sparse Featurizers Capture Visual Concept Manifoldscited by 5
- 2025Superposition disentanglement of neural representations reveals hidden alignmentcited by 4
- 2026Spectral Superposition: A Theory of Feature Geometrycited by 4
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders are Topic Modelscited by 3
- 2025A Geometric Unification of Concept Learning with Concept Conescited by 3
- 2026The Observer Effect in World Models: Invasive Adaptation Corrupts Latent Physicscited by 3
- 2025Sparse, self-organizing ensembles of local kernels detect rare statistical anomaliescited by 1
- 2026GeoLAN: Geometric Learning of Latent Explanatory Directions in Large Language Modelscited by 0
4 more
- 2026Similarity of Neural Network Representations in Superpositioncited by 0
- 2026Similarity-based representation factorization for revealing interpretable dimensions in representational datacited by 0
- 2026A Dominant Diffuse Phase in the Sparse Autoencoder Phase Diagramcited by 0
- 2026TetrisCNN for interpretable detection of phases of matter from experimental quantum simulator datacited by 0
- 2026TetrisCNN for interpretable detection of phases of matter from experimental quantum simulator data17 Sep 2026
- 2026A Dominant Diffuse Phase in the Sparse Autoencoder Phase Diagram9 Sep 2026
- 2026Structuring Sparsity: Block-Sparse Featurizers Capture Visual Concept Manifolds23 Jun 2026
- 2026Similarity-based representation factorization for revealing interpretable dimensions in representational data26 May 2026
- 2026When Does LeJEPA Learn a World Model?25 May 2026
- 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?30 Apr 2026
- 2026Similarity of Neural Network Representations in Superposition31 Mar 2026
- 2026Stop Probing, Start Coding: Why Linear Probes and Sparse Autoencoders Fail at Compositional Generalisation30 Mar 2026
- 2026GeoLAN: Geometric Learning of Latent Explanatory Directions in Large Language Models19 Mar 2026
- 2026The Observer Effect in World Models: Invasive Adaptation Corrupts Latent Physics12 Feb 2026
- 2026Spectral Superposition: A Theory of Feature Geometry2 Feb 2026
- 2025A Geometric Unification of Concept Learning with Concept Cones8 Dec 2025
4 more
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders are Topic Models20 Nov 2025
- 2025Sparse, self-organizing ensembles of local kernels detect rare statistical anomalies5 Nov 2025
- 2025Superposition disentanglement of neural representations reveals hidden alignment3 Oct 2025
- 2025Evaluating SAE interpretability without explanations11 Jul 2025
- 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?cited by 31
- 2026Stop Probing, Start Coding: Why Linear Probes and Sparse Autoencoders Fail at Compositional Generalisationcited by 6
- 2025Evaluating SAE interpretability without explanationscited by 5
- 2025Superposition disentanglement of neural representations reveals hidden alignmentcited by 4
- 2025A Geometric Unification of Concept Learning with Concept Conescited by 3
- 2026Similarity of Neural Network Representations in Superpositioncited by 0
- 2026A Dominant Diffuse Phase in the Sparse Autoencoder Phase Diagramcited by 0
- 2026A Dominant Diffuse Phase in the Sparse Autoencoder Phase Diagram9 Sep 2026
- 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?30 Apr 2026
- 2026Similarity of Neural Network Representations in Superposition31 Mar 2026
- 2026Stop Probing, Start Coding: Why Linear Probes and Sparse Autoencoders Fail at Compositional Generalisation30 Mar 2026
- 2025A Geometric Unification of Concept Learning with Concept Cones8 Dec 2025
- 2025Superposition disentanglement of neural representations reveals hidden alignment3 Oct 2025
- 2025Evaluating SAE interpretability without explanations11 Jul 2025
- 2026When Does LeJEPA Learn a World Model?25 May 2026
- 2026The Observer Effect in World Models: Invasive Adaptation Corrupts Latent Physics12 Feb 2026
- 2026Structuring Sparsity: Block-Sparse Featurizers Capture Visual Concept Manifoldscited by 5
- 2026Spectral Superposition: A Theory of Feature Geometrycited by 4
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders are Topic Modelscited by 3
- 2025Sparse, self-organizing ensembles of local kernels detect rare statistical anomaliescited by 1
- 2026GeoLAN: Geometric Learning of Latent Explanatory Directions in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Similarity-based representation factorization for revealing interpretable dimensions in representational datacited by 0
- 2026TetrisCNN for interpretable detection of phases of matter from experimental quantum simulator datacited by 0
- 2026TetrisCNN for interpretable detection of phases of matter from experimental quantum simulator data17 Sep 2026
- 2026Structuring Sparsity: Block-Sparse Featurizers Capture Visual Concept Manifolds23 Jun 2026
- 2026Similarity-based representation factorization for revealing interpretable dimensions in representational data26 May 2026
- 2026GeoLAN: Geometric Learning of Latent Explanatory Directions in Large Language Models19 Mar 2026
- 2026Spectral Superposition: A Theory of Feature Geometry2 Feb 2026
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders are Topic Models20 Nov 2025
- 2025Sparse, self-organizing ensembles of local kernels detect rare statistical anomalies5 Nov 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Complete or Sparse: A Tale of Two Identifiabilities
- 2026Feature Superposition in Neural Networks: From Theory to Practice
- 2025A Unified Theory of Sparse Dictionary Learning in Mechanistic Interpretability: Piecewise Biconvexity and Spurious Minima
- 2026Sparse Transformer: a Controlled Testbed for Mechanistic Interpretability
- 2024Interpretability as Compression: Reconsidering SAE Explanations of Neural Activations with MDL-SAEs
- 2026Compressed Computation under L4 Loss is likely Computation in Superposition
- 2024Choosing the right basis for interpretability: Psychophysical comparison between neuron-based and dictionary-based representations
- 2026Mechanistic Interpretability for Neural Networks: Circuits, Sparse Features and Symbolic Reasoning