mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Closer Look at Model Adaptation using Feature Distortion and Simplicity Bias

arXiv 2303.13500 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2023cs.LGcited by 20

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Advances in the expressivity of pretrained models have increased interest in the design of adaptation protocols which enable safe and effective transfer learning. Going beyond conventional linear probing (LP) and fine tuning (FT) strategies, protocols that can effectively control feature distortion, i.e., the failure to update features orthogonal to the in-distribution, have been found to achieve improved out-of-distribution generalization (OOD). In order to limit this distortion, the LP+FT protocol, which first learns a linear probe and then uses this initialization for subsequent FT, was proposed. However, in this paper, we find when adaptation protocols (LP, FT, LP+FT) are also evaluated on a variety of safety objectives (e.g., calibration, robustness, etc.), a complementary perspective to feature distortion is helpful to explain protocol behavior. To this end, we study the susceptibility of protocols to simplicity bias (SB), i.e. the well-known propensity of deep neural networks to rely upon simple features, as SB has recently been shown to underlie several problems in robust generalization. Using a synthetic dataset, we demonstrate the susceptibility of existing protocols to SB. Given the strong effectiveness of LP+FT, we then propose modified linear probes that help mitigate SB, and lead to better initializations for subsequent FT. We verify the effectiveness of the proposed LP+FT variants for decreasing SB in a controlled setting, and their ability to improve OOD generalization and safety on three adaptation datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 58 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2023.

Builds on

58 of 66 references.

References · 58

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  4. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  6. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  7. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  8. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  9. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  10. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  11. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  12. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
38 more
  1. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
  2. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,446
  3. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  4. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
  5. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
  6. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  7. 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 920
  8. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
  9. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  10. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 730
  11. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 655
  12. 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 577
  13. 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 569
  14. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 565
  15. 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 514
  16. 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 381
  17. 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 351
  18. 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 316
  19. 2021Unsolved Problems in ML Safetycited by 292
  20. 2021When Vision Transformers Outperform ResNets without Pre-training or Strong Data Augmentationscited by 260
  21. 2019SMART: Robust and Efficient Fine-Tuning for Pre-trained Natural Language Models through Principled Regularized Optimizationcited by 254
  22. 2018Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Linear Convolutional Networkscited by 251
  23. 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 249
  24. 2020Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depthcited by 245
  25. 2019Billion-scale semi-supervised learning for image classificationcited by 232
  26. 2020How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer?cited by 213
  27. 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
  28. 2016What makes ImageNet good for transfer learning?cited by 192
  29. 2020BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shiftcited by 155
  30. 2022Diverse Weight Averaging for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 148
  31. 2022On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlationscited by 145
  32. 2021PixMix: Dreamlike Pictures Comprehensively Improve Safety Measurescited by 131
  33. 2021Self-supervised Learning is More Robust to Dataset Imbalancecited by 123
  34. 2020Feature Purification: How Adversarial Training Performs Robust Deep Learningcited by 107
  35. 2021On Interaction Between Augmentations and Corruptions in Natural Corruption Robustnesscited by 97
  36. 2022Reliability of CKA as a Similarity Measure in Deep Learningcited by 87
  37. 2021Evading the Simplicity Bias: Training a Diverse Set of Models Discovers Solutions with Superior OOD Generalizationcited by 83
  38. 2022Head2Toe: Utilizing Intermediate Representations for Better Transfer Learningcited by 83

50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 9; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Mechanistically analyzing the effects of fine-tuning on procedurally defined taskscited by 115
  2. 2024Understanding Linear Probing then Fine-tuning Language Models from NTK Perspectivecited by 22
  3. 2024Decompose-and-Compose: A Compositional Approach to Mitigating Spurious Correlationcited by 18
  4. 2024Lipsum-FT: Robust Fine-Tuning of Zero-Shot Models Using Random Text Guidancecited by 14
  5. 2024AFreeCA: Annotation-Free Counting for Allcited by 12
  6. 2024Accurate and Scalable Estimation of Epistemic Uncertainty for Graph Neural Networkscited by 8
  7. 2025Evaluating and Improving Robustness in Large Language Models: A Survey and Future Directionscited by 5
  8. 2024Characterizing the Training Dynamics of Private Fine-tuning with Langevin diffusioncited by 4
  9. 2023Domain-Aware Fine-Tuning: Enhancing Neural Network Adaptabilitycited by 3
  10. 2026The Observer Effect in World Models: Invasive Adaptation Corrupts Latent Physicscited by 3
  11. 2023Transformer-Powered Surrogates Close the ICF Simulation-Experiment Gap with Extremely Limited Datacited by 2
  12. 2024Embedding Compression for Teacher-to-Student Knowledge Transfercited by 2
8 more
  1. 2024Towards Utilising a Range of Neural Activations for Comprehending Representational Associationscited by 2
  2. 2025Training-Free Label Space Alignment for Universal Domain Adaptationcited by 1
  3. 2025On Measuring Localization of Shortcuts in Deep Networkscited by 1
  4. 2023Accurate and Scalable Estimation of Epistemic Uncertainty for Graph Neural Networkscited by 0
  5. 2024Mix from Failure: Confusion-Pairing Mixup for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 0
  6. 2025A Critical Review of Predominant Bias in Neural Networkscited by 0
  7. 2025A Closer Look at Personalized Fine-Tuning in Heterogeneous Federated Learningcited by 0
  8. 2026Loss Smoothing for Stable Adaptation Under Distribution Shiftcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Le Cam Distortion: A Decision-Theoretic Framework for Robust Transfer Learning
  2. 2025ModHiFi: Identifying High Fidelity predictive components for Model Modification
  3. 2025Understanding Generalization, Robustness, and Interpretability in Low-Capacity Neural Networks
  4. 2024Enhancing Adversarial Robustness of Vision-Language Models through Low-Rank Adaptation
  5. 2025Model Diffusion for Certifiable Few-shot Transfer Learning
  6. 2024On Fairness of Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Models
  7. 2025Adapt in the Wild: Test-Time Entropy Minimization with Sharpness and Feature Regularization
  8. 2026What Makes VLMs Robust? Towards Reconciling Robustness and Accuracy in Vision-Language Models