What Can Latent World Models Know? Physical Parameter Identifiability in Multimodal Predictive Representations
On the map: World models → Latent predictive world models
Abstract (arXiv)
A central premise of latent world models is that predicting the future encourages representations to internalize the physics of their environment. We ask which physical quantities are accessible in learned latent states, how this depends on training, and how those quantities relate to the model's predictions. We present PokeWorld, a simulated environment in which a robot finger pushes objects whose mass, drag, and contact stiffness vary across episodes while remaining visually identical. We first measure parameter recovery from raw observation sequences, then train matched action-conditioned world models. Prediction targets can strongly shape latent content. For example, contact stiffness becomes decodable when touch is predicted, while providing touch only as an input does not. Longer-horizon prediction improves estimation of position and velocity from learned representations relative to single-step prediction. Drag is recoverable from raw observations, but has weak linear readout from the learned latent states. Yet the models' glide forecasts depend systematically on drag. Experiments on RH20T reproduce the same input-target dependence on real multimodal robot data. Together, these results show that observations, prediction targets, and prediction horizons shape both which physical quantities are accessible in latent states and how they affect future predictions.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Latent predictive world models, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 24 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.
Builds on
24 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 11
Same direction, newest first
- 2026On the Identifiability of Controlled World Models24 Jul
- 2026The SIGReg Objective as Variational Free Energy: A Theoretical Active-Inference Account of JEPA World Models15 Jul
- 2026A Control Theory of Predictability in Latent World Models11 Jul
- 2026A Generalization Theory for JEPA-Based World Models25 Jun
- 2026Physics from Video: Identifiability of Time-Invariant Second-Order ODEs under Minimal Trajectory Conditions27 May
- 2026When Does LeJEPA Learn a World Model?25 May
- 2026LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixels13 Mar
- 2026Interpreting Physics in Video World Models4 Feb
- 2025What Drives Success in Physical Planning with Joint-Embedding Predictive World Models?30 Dec
- 2024DINO-WM: World Models on Pre-trained Visual Features enable Zero-shot Planning7 Nov
- 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture19 Jan
Other references · 13
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
- 2025V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planningcited by 738
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 608
- 2025LeJEPA: Provable and Scalable Self-Supervised Learning Without the Heuristicscited by 227
- 2023RH20T: A Comprehensive Robotic Dataset for Learning Diverse Skills in One-Shotcited by 173
- 2025Do generative video models understand physical principles?cited by 151
- 2024Scaling Proprioceptive-Visual Learning with Heterogeneous Pre-trained Transformerscited by 145
- 2025Intuitive physics understanding emerges from self-supervised pretraining on natural videoscited by 66
- 2019DensePhysNet: Learning Dense Physical Object Representations via Multi-step Dynamic Interactionscited by 61
- 2024Sparsh: Self-supervised touch representations for vision-based tactile sensingcited by 61
- 2026TouchWorld: A Predictive and Reactive Tactile Foundation Model for Dexterous Manipulationcited by 9
- 2026TacGen: Touch Is a Necessary Dimension of Physical-World Representation -- Addressing Tactile Data Scarcity with Scalable Vision-to-Touch Alignment and Generationcited by 1
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026LaWM: Least Action World Models for Long-Horizon Physical Consistency from Visual Observations
- 2026Identifiability Without Gaussianity: Symbolic World Models and Near-Infinite Temporal Consistency
- 2025Four Principles for Physically Interpretable World Models
- 2026The Observer Effect in World Models: Invasive Adaptation Corrupts Latent Physics
- 2026Physically Native World Models: A Hamiltonian Perspective on Generative World Modeling
- 2026Energy-Structured Latent World Models with Neural Time Fields for Physically Constistent Open-World Motion Planning
- 2026Physically Viable World Models: A Case for Query-Conditioned Embodied AI
- 2026Counterfactual Action Evaluation, Observation Bottlenecks, and Representation Geometry in Joint-Embedding Predictive World Models