Pricing Query Complexity of Multiplicative Revenue Approximation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the pricing query complexity of revenue maximization for a single buyer whose private valuation is drawn from an unknown distribution. In this setting, the seller must learn the optimal monopoly price by posting prices and observing only binary purchase decisions, rather than the realized valuations. Prior work has established tight query complexity bounds for learning a near-optimal price with additive error varepsilon when the valuation distribution is supported on [0,1]. However, our understanding of how to learn a near-optimal price that achieves at least a (1-varepsilon) fraction of the optimal revenue remains limited. In this paper, we study the pricing query complexity of the single-buyer revenue maximization problem under such multiplicative error guarantees in several settings. Observe that when pricing queries are the only source of information about the buyer's distribution, no algorithm can achieve a non-trivial approximation, since the scale of the distribution cannot be learned from pricing queries alone. Motivated by this fundamental impossibility, we consider two natural and well-motivated models that provide "scale hints": (i) a one-sample hint, in which the algorithm observes a single realized valuation before making pricing queries; and (ii) a value-range hint, in which the valuation support is known to lie within [1, H]. For each type of hint, we establish pricing query complexity guarantees that are tight up to polylogarithmic factors for several classes of distributions, including monotone hazard rate (MHR) distributions, regular distributions, and general distributions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2026.
Builds on
33 of 43 references.
References · 33
- 2015The Sample Complexity of Revenue Maximizationcited by 48
- 2019Settling the Sample Complexity of Single-parameter Revenue Maximizationcited by 24
- 2019Multi-Item Mechanisms without Item-Independence: Learnability via Robustnesscited by 22
- 2015The Sample Complexity of Auctions with Side Informationcited by 20
- 2018The Sample Complexity of Up-to-varepsilon Multi-Dimensional Revenue Maximizationcited by 17
- 2014Making the Most of Your Samplescited by 15
- 2020Efficient Two-Sided Markets with Limited Informationcited by 14
- 2013Prophet Inequalities with Limited Informationcited by 13
- 2015Ironing in the Darkcited by 13
- 2021Pricing Query Complexity of Revenue Maximizationcited by 12
- 2016Efficient Empirical Revenue Maximization in Single-Parameter Auction Environmentscited by 11
- 2017A Sample Complexity Measure with Applications to Learning Optimal Auctionscited by 11
21 more
- 2024Sample Complexity of Posted Pricing for a Single Itemcited by 10
- 2019Optimal Single-Choice Prophet Inequalities from Samplescited by 9
- 2021Single-Sample Prophet Inequalities via Greedy-Ordered Selectioncited by 8
- 2014Combinatorial Auctions via Posted Pricescited by 7
- 2021Online Weighted Matching with a Samplecited by 6
- 2015Randomization beats Second Price as a Prior-Independent Auctioncited by 5
- 2021Optimal Pricing with a Single Pointcited by 5
- 2023Bandit Sequential Posted Pricing via Half-Concavitycited by 5
- 2018Are Two (Samples) Really Better Than One? On the Non-Asymptotic Performance of Empirical Revenue Maximizationcited by 4
- 2019Learning Reserve Prices in Second-Price Auctionscited by 4
- 2022Strong Revenue (Non-)Monotonicity of Single-parameter Auctionscited by 3
- 2023Learning Thresholds with Latent Values and Censored Feedbackcited by 3
- 2024Online Combinatorial Allocations and Auctions with Few Samplescited by 3
- 2025Single-Sample and Robust Online Resource Allocationcited by 3
- 2022Secretary Problems: The Power of a Single Samplecited by 2
- 2021Single-Sample Prophet Inequalities Revisitedcited by 1
- 2024Static Pricing for Single Sample Multi-unit Prophet Inequalitiescited by 1
- 2025Learning Optimal Posted Prices for a Unit-Demand Buyercited by 1
- 2025Polynomial-Time Approximation Schemes via Utility Alignment: Unit-Demand Pricing and Morecited by 1
- 2025The Query Complexity of Uniform Pricingcited by 1
- 2025Smoothed Analysis of Online Metric Matching with a Single Sample: Beyond Metric Distortioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.