Learning Reserve Prices in Second-Price Auctions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper proves the tight sample complexity of sf Second-Price Auction with Anonymous Reserve, up to a logarithmic factor, for each of all the value distribution families studied in the literature: [0,, 1]-bounded, [1,, H]-bounded, regular, and monotone hazard rate (MHR). Remarkably, the setting-specific tight sample complexity mathsfpoly(varepsilon-1) depends on the precision varepsilon ∈ (0, 1), but not on the number of bidders n ≥ 1. Further, in the two bounded-support settings, our learning algorithm allows em correlated value distributions. In contrast, the tight sample complexity tildeTheta(n) · mathsfpoly(varepsilon-1) of sf Myerson Auction proved by Guo, Huang and Zhang (STOC~2019) has a nearly-linear dependence on n ≥ 1, and holds only for em independent value distributions in every setting. We follow a similar framework as the Guo-Huang-Zhang work, but replace their information theoretical arguments with a direct proof.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2026Pricing Query Complexity of Multiplicative Revenue Approximation11 Feb 2026
- 2025Learning Optimal Posted Prices for a Unit-Demand Buyer2 Jun 2025
- 2024Are Bounded Contracts Learnable and Approximately Optimal?22 Feb 2024
- 2023Bandit Sequential Posted Pricing via Half-Concavity20 Dec 2023