mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Reserve Prices in Second-Price Auctions

arXiv 1912.10069 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2019cs.GTcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper proves the tight sample complexity of sf Second-Price Auction with Anonymous Reserve, up to a logarithmic factor, for each of all the value distribution families studied in the literature: [0,, 1]-bounded, [1,, H]-bounded, regular, and monotone hazard rate (MHR). Remarkably, the setting-specific tight sample complexity mathsfpoly(varepsilon-1) depends on the precision varepsilon ∈ (0, 1), but not on the number of bidders n ≥ 1. Further, in the two bounded-support settings, our learning algorithm allows em correlated value distributions. In contrast, the tight sample complexity tildeTheta(n) · mathsfpoly(varepsilon-1) of sf Myerson Auction proved by Guo, Huang and Zhang (STOC~2019) has a nearly-linear dependence on n ≥ 1, and holds only for em independent value distributions in every setting. We follow a similar framework as the Guo-Huang-Zhang work, but replace their information theoretical arguments with a direct proof.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.