Prophet Inequalities with Limited Information
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the classical prophet inequality, a gambler observes a sequence of stochastic rewards V1,...,Vn and must decide, for each reward Vi, whether to keep it and stop the game or to forfeit the reward forever and reveal the next value Vi. The gambler's goal is to obtain a constant fraction of the expected reward that the optimal offline algorithm would get. Recently, prophet inequalities have been generalized to settings where the gambler can choose k items, and, more generally, where he can choose any independent set in a matroid. However, all the existing algorithms require the gambler to know the distribution from which the rewards V1,...,Vn are drawn. The assumption that the gambler knows the distribution from which V1,...,Vn are drawn is very strong. Instead, we work with the much simpler assumption that the gambler only knows a few samples from this distribution. We construct the first single-sample prophet inequalities for many settings of interest, whose guarantees all match the best possible asymptotically, even with full knowledge of the distribution. Specifically, we provide a novel single-sample algorithm when the gambler can choose any k elements whose analysis is based on random walks with limited correlation. In addition, we provide a black-box method for converting specific types of solutions to the related secretary problem to single-sample prophet inequalities, and apply it to several existing algorithms. Finally, we provide a constant-sample prophet inequality for constant-degree bipartite matchings. We apply these results to design the first posted-price and multi-dimensional auction mechanisms with limited information in settings with asymmetric bidders.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2013.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2022Bandit Algorithms for Prophet Inequality and Pandora's Boxcited by 13
- 2023Semi-Bandit Learning for Monotone Stochastic Optimizationcited by 8
- 2023Robust Budget Pacing with a Single Samplecited by 4
- 2021Online Adversarial Attackscited by 3
- 2024Online Combinatorial Allocations and Auctions with Few Samplescited by 3
- 2025Single-Sample and Robust Online Resource Allocationcited by 3
- 2026Non-Stationary Online Resource Allocation: Learning from a Single Samplecited by 1
- 2024The Competition Complexity of Prophet Inequalities with Correlationscited by 0
- 2025T-TAMER: Provably Taming Trade-offs in ML Servingcited by 0
- 2025Online Algorithms for Repeated Optimal Stopping: Balancing Baseline Guarantees and Regretcited by 0
- 2026Pricing Query Complexity of Multiplicative Revenue Approximationcited by 0
- 2026Adaptive Weighted Averagingcited by 0
1 more
- 2026Optimal No-Regret Learning for Repeated Prophet Inequality20 Sep 2026
- 2026Adaptive Weighted Averaging11 Jun 2026
- 2026Non-Stationary Online Resource Allocation: Learning from a Single Sample20 Feb 2026
- 2026Pricing Query Complexity of Multiplicative Revenue Approximation11 Feb 2026
- 2025Online Algorithms for Repeated Optimal Stopping: Balancing Baseline Guarantees and Regret6 Nov 2025
- 2025T-TAMER: Provably Taming Trade-offs in ML Serving26 Sep 2025
- 2025Single-Sample and Robust Online Resource Allocation5 May 2025
- 2024Online Combinatorial Allocations and Auctions with Few Samples17 Sep 2024
- 2024The Competition Complexity of Prophet Inequalities with Correlations10 Sep 2024
- 2023Semi-Bandit Learning for Monotone Stochastic Optimization24 Dec 2023
- 2023Robust Budget Pacing with a Single Sample3 Feb 2023
- 2022Bandit Algorithms for Prophet Inequality and Pandora's Box16 Nov 2022
1 more
- 2021Online Adversarial Attacks2 Mar 2021
- 2025T-TAMER: Provably Taming Trade-offs in ML Servingcited by 0
- 2025T-TAMER: Provably Taming Trade-offs in ML Serving26 Sep 2025
- 2022Bandit Algorithms for Prophet Inequality and Pandora's Boxcited by 13
- 2023Semi-Bandit Learning for Monotone Stochastic Optimizationcited by 8
- 2023Robust Budget Pacing with a Single Samplecited by 4
- 2021Online Adversarial Attackscited by 3
- 2024Online Combinatorial Allocations and Auctions with Few Samplescited by 3
- 2025Single-Sample and Robust Online Resource Allocationcited by 3
- 2026Non-Stationary Online Resource Allocation: Learning from a Single Samplecited by 1
- 2024The Competition Complexity of Prophet Inequalities with Correlationscited by 0
- 2025Online Algorithms for Repeated Optimal Stopping: Balancing Baseline Guarantees and Regretcited by 0
- 2026Pricing Query Complexity of Multiplicative Revenue Approximationcited by 0
- 2026Adaptive Weighted Averagingcited by 0
- 2026Optimal No-Regret Learning for Repeated Prophet Inequalitycited by 0
- 2026Optimal No-Regret Learning for Repeated Prophet Inequality20 Sep 2026
- 2026Adaptive Weighted Averaging11 Jun 2026
- 2026Non-Stationary Online Resource Allocation: Learning from a Single Sample20 Feb 2026
- 2026Pricing Query Complexity of Multiplicative Revenue Approximation11 Feb 2026
- 2025Online Algorithms for Repeated Optimal Stopping: Balancing Baseline Guarantees and Regret6 Nov 2025
- 2025Single-Sample and Robust Online Resource Allocation5 May 2025
- 2024Online Combinatorial Allocations and Auctions with Few Samples17 Sep 2024
- 2024The Competition Complexity of Prophet Inequalities with Correlations10 Sep 2024
- 2023Semi-Bandit Learning for Monotone Stochastic Optimization24 Dec 2023
- 2023Robust Budget Pacing with a Single Sample3 Feb 2023
- 2022Bandit Algorithms for Prophet Inequality and Pandora's Box16 Nov 2022
- 2021Online Adversarial Attacks2 Mar 2021