mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Bandit Sequential Posted Pricing via Half-Concavity

arXiv 2312.12794 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.DS cs.GTcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sequential posted pricing auctions are popular because of their simplicity in practice and their tractability in theory. A usual assumption in their study is that the Bayesian prior distributions of the buyers are known to the seller, while in reality these priors can only be accessed from historical data. To overcome this assumption, we study sequential posted pricing in the bandit learning model, where the seller interacts with n buyers over T rounds: In each round the seller posts n prices for the n buyers and the first buyer with a valuation higher than the price takes the item. The only feedback that the seller receives in each round is the revenue. Our main results obtain nearly-optimal regret bounds for single-item sequential posted pricing in the bandit learning model. In particular, we achieve an tildeO(mathsfpoly(n)√T) regret for buyers with (Myerson's) regular distributions and an tildeO(mathsfpoly(n)T^2/3) regret for buyers with general distributions, both of which are tight in the number of rounds T. Our result for regular distributions was previously not known even for the single-buyer setting and relies on a new half-concavity property of the revenue function in the value space. For n sequential buyers, our technique is to run a generalized single-buyer algorithm for all the buyers and to carefully bound the regret from the sub-optimal pricing of the suffix buyers.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2023.

Builds on

24 of 47 references.

References · 24

  1. 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 479
  2. 2013Bandits with Knapsackscited by 163
  3. 2018Adversarial Bandits with Knapsackscited by 73
  4. 2014Lipschitz Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 59
  5. 2015The Sample Complexity of Revenue Maximizationcited by 48
  6. 2021Online Learning via Offline Greedy Algorithms: Applications in Market Design and Optimizationcited by 40
  7. 2014Unimodal Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 36
  8. 2019Settling the Sample Complexity of Single-parameter Revenue Maximizationcited by 24
  9. 2016Learning Simple Auctionscited by 23
  10. 2018Dynamic Pricing with Finitely Many Unknown Valuationscited by 23
  11. 2019Generalizing Complex Hypotheses on Product Distributions: Auctions, Prophet Inequalities, and Pandora's Problemcited by 22
  12. 2015The Sample Complexity of Auctions with Side Informationcited by 20
12 more
  1. 2017Learning Multi-item Auctions with (or without) Samplescited by 18
  2. 2018The Sample Complexity of Up-to-varepsilon Multi-Dimensional Revenue Maximizationcited by 17
  3. 2014Making the Most of Your Samplescited by 15
  4. 2015Ironing in the Darkcited by 13
  5. 2022Bandit Algorithms for Prophet Inequality and Pandora's Boxcited by 13
  6. 2021Pricing Query Complexity of Revenue Maximizationcited by 12
  7. 2016Efficient Empirical Revenue Maximization in Single-Parameter Auction Environmentscited by 11
  8. 2019Learning Reserve Prices in Second-Price Auctionscited by 4
  9. 2021Learning with Comparison Feedback: Online Estimation of Sample Statisticscited by 4
  10. 2021Computing Simple Mechanisms: Lift-and-Round over Marginal Reduced Formscited by 3
  11. 2023Description Complexity of Regular Distributionscited by 3
  12. 2023Non-Stochastic CDF Estimation Using Threshold Queriescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.