mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-Item Mechanisms without Item-Independence: Learnability via Robustness

arXiv 1911.02146 ↗First posted 6 Nov 2019cs.GT cs.DS cs.LGcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the sample complexity of learning revenue-optimal multi-item auctions. We obtain the first set of positive results that go beyond the standard but unrealistic setting of item-independence. In particular, we consider settings where bidders' valuations are drawn from correlated distributions that can be captured by Markov Random Fields or Bayesian Networks -- two of the most prominent graphical models. We establish parametrized sample complexity bounds for learning an up-to-varepsilon optimal mechanism in both models, which scale polynomially in the size of the model, i.e.~the number of items and bidders, and only exponential in the natural complexity measure of the model, namely either the largest in-degree (for Bayesian Networks) or the size of the largest hyper-edge (for Markov Random Fields). We obtain our learnability results through a novel and modular framework that involves first proving a robustness theorem. We show that, given only ``approximate distributions'' for bidder valuations, we can learn a mechanism whose revenue is nearly optimal simultaneously for all ``true distributions'' that are close to the ones we were given in Prokhorov distance. Thus, to learn a good mechanism, it suffices to learn approximate distributions. When item values are independent, learning in Prokhorov distance is immediate, hence our framework directly implies the main result of Gonczarowski and Weinberg. When item values are sampled from more general graphical models, we combine our robustness theorem with novel sample complexity results for learning Markov Random Fields or Bayesian Networks in Prokhorov distance, which may be of independent interest. Finally, in the single-item case, our robustness result can be strengthened to hold under an even weaker distribution distance, the L'evy distance.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

22 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Beyond IID: data-driven decision-making in heterogeneous environmentscited by 9
  2. 2022Learning and Testing Latent-Tree Ising Models Efficientlycited by 7
  3. 2023New Guarantees for Learning Revenue Maximizing Menus of Lotteries and Two-Part Tariffscited by 4
  4. 2021Robust Learning of Optimal Auctionscited by 3
  5. 2023Learning Thresholds with Latent Values and Censored Feedbackcited by 3
  6. 2021Learning Sparse Fixed-Structure Gaussian Bayesian Networkscited by 2
  7. 2021Recommender Systems meet Mechanism Designcited by 2
  8. 2022Estimation of Standard Auction Modelscited by 2
  9. 2025Estimating Ising Models in Total Variation Distancecited by 2
  10. 2023User Response in Ad Auctions: An MDP Formulation of Long-Term Revenue Optimizationcited by 1
  11. 2024Online Auction Design Using Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification with Applications to E-Commercecited by 1
  12. 2024Distribution Learning Meets Graph Structure Samplingcited by 1
10 more
  1. 2024Learnability of Parameter-Bounded Bayes Netscited by 1
  2. 2025Learning Optimal Posted Prices for a Unit-Demand Buyercited by 1
  3. 2022Sample Complexity of Forecast Aggregationcited by 0
  4. 2023A Robust Multi-Item Auction Design with Statistical Learningcited by 0
  5. 2023Refined Mechanism Design for Approximately Structured Priors via Active Regressioncited by 0
  6. 2025Contextual Learning for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 0
  7. 2025Learning to Coordinate Bidders in Non-Truthful Auctionscited by 0
  8. 2026Pricing Query Complexity of Multiplicative Revenue Approximationcited by 0
  9. 2026Is Online Linear Optimization Sufficient for Strategic Robustness?cited by 0
  10. 2026On the Learning Curves of Revenue Maximizationcited by 0