mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neuro-Symbolic Synergy for World Modeling

arXiv 2602.10480 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2026cs.CLcited by 6

On the map: World models → World models for language agents

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong general-purpose reasoning capabilities, yet they frequently hallucinate when used as world models (WMs), where strict compliance with deterministic transition rules--particularly in corner cases--is essential. In contrast, Symbolic WMs provide logical consistency but lack semantic expressivity. To bridge this gap, we propose Neuro-Symbolic Synergy (NeSyS), a framework that integrates the probabilistic semantic priors of LLMs with executable symbolic rules to achieve both expressivity and robustness. NeSyS alternates training between the two models using trajectories inadequately explained by the other. Unlike rule-based prompting, the symbolic WM contributes candidate-level scores through log-linear reranking, without requiring the LLM to interpret rule text. Rule-guided sampling prioritizes transitions that are weakly covered by symbolic rules, using 35--60% of the training pairs while outperforming full-data supervised fine-tuning in five of six settings. Experiments on ScienceWorld, WebShop, and PlanCraft demonstrate consistent gains in WM prediction accuracy and data efficiency; one-step lookahead on open-ended WebShop also improves agent reward. Our models, rules, and code are available at https://github.com/tianyi-lab/NeSyS.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in World models for language agents, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 21 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2026.

Builds on

21 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025WorldLLM: Improving LLMs' world modeling using curiosity-driven theory-making7 Jun
  2. 2024LLM-Based World Models Can Make Decisions Solely, But Rigorous Evaluations are Needed13 Nov
  3. 2024Web Agents with World Models: Learning and Leveraging Environment Dynamics in Web Navigation17 Oct
  4. 2024WALL-E: World Alignment by Rule Learning Improves World Model-based LLM Agents9 Oct

Other references · 17

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  3. 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,197
  4. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  5. 2022ScienceWorld: Is your Agent Smarter than a 5th Grader?cited by 298
  6. 2026SkillRL: Evolving Agents via Recursive Skill-Augmented Reinforcement Learningcited by 252
  7. 2023Efficient Guided Generation for Large Language Modelscited by 192
  8. 2024GTBench: Uncovering the Strategic Reasoning Limitations of LLMs via Game-Theoretic Evaluationscited by 118
  9. 2024Guiding LLMs The Right Way: Fast, Non-Invasive Constrained Generationcited by 99
  10. 2023CLIN: A Continually Learning Language Agent for Rapid Task Adaptation and Generalizationcited by 88
  11. 2024VisualPredicator: Learning Abstract World Models with Neuro-Symbolic Predicates for Robot Planningcited by 37
  12. 2024Plancraft: an evaluation dataset for planning with LLM agentscited by 16
5 more
  1. 2023Neuro-Symbolic World Models for Adapting to Open World Noveltycited by 14
  2. 2023Neurosymbolic Grounding for Compositional World Modelscited by 14
  3. 2024Selection of LLM Fine-Tuning Data based on Orthogonal Rulescited by 12
  4. 2025ChopChop: a Programmable Framework for Semantically Constraining the Output of Language Modelscited by 12
  5. 2024Language Models can Infer Action Semantics for Symbolic Planners from Environment Feedbackcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Logically Consistent Language Models via Neuro-Symbolic Integration
  2. 2025Enhancing Large Language Models through Neuro-Symbolic Integration and Ontological Reasoning
  3. 2024Symbolic Working Memory Enhances Language Models for Complex Rule Application
  4. 2025Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: Towards Improving the Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models
  5. 2025Intermediate Languages Matter: Formal Languages and LLMs affect Neurosymbolic Reasoning
  6. 2025Rethinking Reasoning in LLMs: Neuro-Symbolic Local RetoMaton Beyond ICL and CoT
  7. 2025Intermediate Languages Matter: Formal Choice Drives Neurosymbolic LLM Reasoning
  8. 2026NeuroProlog: Multi-Task Fine-Tuning for Neurosymbolic Mathematical Reasoning via the Cocktail Effect