mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Configuration-to-Performance Scaling Law with Neural Ansatz

arXiv 2602.10300 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Researchers build scaling laws to forecast the training performance of expensive large-scale runs with larger model size N and data size D. These laws assume that other training hyperparameters are optimally chosen, which can require significant effort and, in some cases, be impossible due to external hardware constraints. To improve predictability across a broader set of hyperparameters and enable simpler tuning at scale, we propose learning a textitConfiguration-to-Performance Scaling Law (CPL): a mapping from the textitfull training configuration to training performance. Because no simple functional form can express this mapping, we parameterize it with a large language model (LLM), and fit it with diverse open-source pretraining logs across multiple sources, yielding a textitNeural Configuration-to-Performance Scaling Law (NCPL). NCPL accurately predicts how training configurations influence the final pretraining loss, achieving 20-40% lower prediction error than the configuration-agnostic Chinchilla law and generalizing to runs using up to 10 x more compute than any run in the training set. It further supports joint tuning of multiple hyperparameters with performance comparable to hyperparameter scaling law baselines. Finally, NCPL naturally and effectively extends to richer prediction targets such as loss-curve prediction.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 72 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.

Builds on

72 of 84 references.

References · 72

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  3. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  4. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  5. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
  6. 2024DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 834
  7. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
  8. 2022What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classescited by 700
  9. 2024MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategiescited by 694
  10. 2023Time-LLM: Time Series Forecasting by Reprogramming Large Language Modelscited by 680
  11. 2023A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecastingcited by 650
  12. 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 643
38 more
  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
  2. 2023Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Time Series Forecasterscited by 491
  3. 2024Gated Delta Networks: Improving Mamba2 with Delta Rulecited by 483
  4. 2024MOMENT: A Family of Open Time-series Foundation Modelscited by 453
  5. 2023Symbolic Discovery of Optimization Algorithmscited by 423
  6. 2020TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddingscited by 398
  7. 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 381
  8. 2025Muon is Scalable for LLM Trainingcited by 381
  9. 2025SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Modelcited by 307
  10. 2017Three Factors Influencing Minima in SGDcited by 270
  11. 2018An Empirical Model of Large-Batch Trainingcited by 268
  12. 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 265
  13. 2025Kimi Linear: An Expressive, Efficient Attention Architecturecited by 169
  14. 2024Scaling Laws for Fine-Grained Mixture of Expertscited by 166
  15. 2024Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Language Model Performancecited by 128
  16. 2024Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream taskscited by 105
  17. 2022Broken Neural Scaling Lawscited by 102
  18. 2022On the SDEs and Scaling Rules for Adaptive Gradient Algorithmscited by 100
  19. 2025The Art of Scaling Reinforcement Learning Compute for LLMscited by 91
  20. 2025Fantastic Pretraining Optimizers and Where to Find Themcited by 87
  21. 2024Resolving Discrepancies in Compute-Optimal Scaling of Language Modelscited by 84
  22. 2024Scaling Exponents Across Parameterizations and Optimizerscited by 71
  23. 2025Don't be lazy: CompleteP enables compute-efficient deep transformerscited by 69
  24. 2024How Does Critical Batch Size Scale in Pre-training?cited by 68
  25. 2023Depthwise Hyperparameter Transfer in Residual Networks: Dynamics and Scaling Limitcited by 64
  26. 2024From Words to Numbers: Your Large Language Model Is Secretly A Capable Regressor When Given In-Context Examplescited by 55
  27. 2024How to set AdamW's weight decay as you scale model and dataset sizecited by 42
  28. 2025Power Lines: Scaling Laws for Weight Decay and Batch Size in LLM Pre-trainingcited by 41
  29. 2023Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networkscited by 37
  30. 2025Small Batch Size Training for Language Models: When Vanilla SGD Works, and Why Gradient Accumulation Is Wastefulcited by 36
  31. 2024Scaling Optimal LR Across Token Horizonscited by 35
  32. 2024OmniPred: Language Models as Universal Regressorscited by 34
  33. 2024Establishing Task Scaling Laws via Compute-Efficient Model Ladderscited by 32
  34. 2025Predictable Scale: Part I, Step Law -- Optimal Hyperparameter Scaling Law in Large Language Model Pretrainingcited by 30
  35. 2024LLM-Select: Feature Selection with Large Language Modelscited by 29
  36. 2024u-μP: The Unit-Scaled Maximal Update Parametrizationcited by 29
  37. 2024Scaling Law with Learning Rate Annealingcited by 29
  38. 2025Scaling Laws Are Unreliable for Downstream Tasks: A Reality Checkcited by 27

50 most cited of 72 All 72 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.