On the Nonlinearity of Learning Rate Scaling for LLM Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning-rate transfer can reduce the cost of training large language models: instead of sweeping learning rates at target scale, practitioners extrapolate from smaller runs. Existing approaches often assume that the optimal learning rate follows a log-linear scaling law in data scale and model size. We carefully examine and evaluate this scaling law. In our empirical study of GPT-2--style models from 22M to 707M parameters trained on 5B to 100B tokens, the optimal learning rate develops upward curvature at larger scales, leading to inaccurate extrapolation. We find that this curvature largely disappears when learning rates are replaced by effective learning rate (the step size in normalized weight space), and when data D extrapolation is used instead of model size N extrapolation. Next, we explain nonlinearity in scaling: weight-norm converges to equilibrium slower when optimal learning is small, requiring a larger step size to reduce the transient phase. Experiments with AdamH, which directly controls the effective learning rate, further support this explanation.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2026.
Builds on
41 of 48 references.
References · 41
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2024MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategiescited by 723
- 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 642
- 2025Muon is Scalable for LLM Trainingcited by 428
- 2018An Empirical Model of Large-Batch Trainingcited by 281
- 2017Three Factors Influencing Minima in SGDcited by 273
- 2017L2 Regularization versus Batch and Weight Normalizationcited by 124
- 2022On the SDEs and Scaling Rules for Adaptive Gradient Algorithmscited by 104
29 more
- 2024Resolving Discrepancies in Compute-Optimal Scaling of Language Modelscited by 88
- 2025Don't be lazy: CompleteP enables compute-efficient deep transformerscited by 78
- 2024Scaling Exponents Across Parameterizations and Optimizerscited by 76
- 2024How Does Critical Batch Size Scale in Pre-training?cited by 73
- 2024nGPT: Normalized Transformer with Representation Learning on the Hyperspherecited by 70
- 2023Depthwise Hyperparameter Transfer in Residual Networks: Dynamics and Scaling Limitcited by 66
- 2018Norm matters: efficient and accurate normalization schemes in deep networkscited by 62
- 2020Reconciling Modern Deep Learning with Traditional Optimization Analyses: The Intrinsic Learning Ratecited by 59
- 2023Rotational Equilibrium: How Weight Decay Balances Learning Across Neural Networkscited by 53
- 2024How to set AdamW's weight decay as you scale model and dataset sizecited by 43
- 2025Power Lines: Scaling Laws for Weight Decay and Batch Size in LLM Pre-trainingcited by 43
- 2025Small Batch Size Training for Language Models: When Vanilla SGD Works, and Why Gradient Accumulation Is Wastefulcited by 41
- 2024Scaling Optimal LR Across Token Horizonscited by 40
- 2025Predictable Scale: Part I, Step Law -- Optimal Hyperparameter Scaling Law in Large Language Model Pretrainingcited by 34
- 2026Controlled LLM Training on Spectral Spherecited by 31
- 2025The Sharpness Disparity Principle in Transformers for Accelerating Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 30
- 2024u-μP: The Unit-Scaled Maximal Update Parametrizationcited by 29
- 2024Scaling Law with Learning Rate Annealingcited by 29
- 2025Completed Hyperparameter Transfer across Modules, Width, Depth, Batch and Durationcited by 27
- 2024Scaling Laws Across Model Architectures: A Comparative Analysis of Dense and MoE Models in Large Language Modelscited by 25
- 2025A Multi-Power Law for Loss Curve Prediction Across Learning Rate Schedulescited by 22
- 2025Weight Decay may matter more than muP for Learning Rate Transfer in Practicecited by 20
- 2026Fantastic Pretraining Optimizers and Where to Find Them II: Hyperball Optimizationcited by 16
- 2025Nemotron-Flash: Towards Latency-Optimal Hybrid Small Language Modelscited by 15
- 2025Robust Layerwise Scaling Rules by Proper Weight Decay Tuningcited by 8
- 2026How to Set the Learning Rate for Large-Scale Pre-training?cited by 5
- 2025Efficient Hyperparameter Tuning via Trajectory Invariance Principlecited by 4
- 2025Tune My Adam, Please!cited by 2
- 2026Configuration-to-Performance Scaling Law with Neural Ansatzcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.