Structure-Aware Robust Counterfactual Explanations via Conditional Gaussian Network Classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Counterfactual explanation (CE) is a core technique in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), widely used to interpret model decisions and suggest actionable alternatives. This work presents a structure-aware and robustness-oriented counterfactual search method based on the conditional Gaussian network classifier (CGNC). The CGNC has a generative structure that encodes conditional dependencies and potential causal relations among features through a directed acyclic graph (DAG). This structure naturally embeds feature relationships into the search process, eliminating the need for additional constraints to ensure consistency with the model's structural assumptions. We adopt a convergence-guaranteed cutting-set procedure as an adversarial optimization framework, which iteratively approximates solutions that satisfy global robustness conditions. To address the nonconvex quadratic structure induced by feature dependencies, we apply piecewise McCormick relaxation to reformulate the problem as a mixed-integer linear program (MILP), ensuring global optimality. Experimental results show that our method achieves strong robustness, with direct global optimization of the original formulation providing especially stable and efficient results. The proposed framework is extensible to more complex constraint settings, laying the groundwork for future advances in counterfactual reasoning under nonconvex quadratic formulations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2026.
Builds on
24 of 47 references.
References · 24
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
- 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 745
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
- 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 327
- 2020Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventionscited by 250
- 2019Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Consequential Decisionscited by 204
- 2021Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysiscited by 147
- 2019Preserving Causal Constraints in Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 143
- 2021Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Meta-Survey of Current Challenges and Future Opportunitiescited by 125
12 more
- 2020A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospectscited by 118
- 2021Counterfactual Explanations Can Be Manipulatedcited by 113
- 2019Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanationscited by 111
- 2015Optimal whitening and decorrelationcited by 93
- 2021On the Adversarial Robustness of Causal Algorithmic Recoursecited by 56
- 2013Estimating Continuous Distributions in Bayesian Classifierscited by 53
- 2021Exploring Counterfactual Explanations Through the Lens of Adversarial Examples: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysiscited by 52
- 2021A Survey on the Robustness of Feature Importance and Counterfactual Explanationscited by 38
- 2022On the Robustness of Sparse Counterfactual Explanations to Adverse Perturbationscited by 32
- 2019Issues with post-hoc counterfactual explanations: a discussioncited by 30
- 2023Finding Regions of Counterfactual Explanations via Robust Optimizationcited by 19
- 2013Comparing Bayesian Network Classifierscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.