mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparing Bayesian Network Classifiers

arXiv 1301.6684 ↗First posted 23 Jan 2013cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we empirically evaluate algorithms for learning four types of Bayesian network (BN) classifiers - Naive-Bayes, tree augmented Naive-Bayes, BN augmented Naive-Bayes and general BNs, where the latter two are learned using two variants of a conditional-independence (CI) based BN-learning algorithm. Experimental results show the obtained classifiers, learned using the CI based algorithms, are competitive with (or superior to) the best known classifiers, based on both Bayesian networks and other formalisms; and that the computational time for learning and using these classifiers is relatively small. Moreover, these results also suggest a way to learn yet more effective classifiers; we demonstrate empirically that this new algorithm does work as expected. Collectively, these results argue that BN classifiers deserve more attention in machine learning and data mining communities.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2013.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.