Beyond Crash: Hijacking Your Autonomous Vehicle for Fun and Profit
On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Adversarial scenarios and safety testing
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous Vehicles (AVs), especially vision-based AVs, are rapidly being deployed without human operators. As AVs operate in safety-critical environments, understanding their robustness in an adversarial environment is an important research problem. Prior physical adversarial attacks on vision-based autonomous vehicles predominantly target immediate safety failures (e.g., a crash, a traffic-rule violation, or a transient lane departure) by inducing a short-lived perception or control error. This paper shows a qualitatively different risk: a long-horizon route integrity compromise, where an attacker gradually steers a victim AV away from its intended route and into an attacker-chosen destination while the victim continues to drive ``normally.'' This will not pose a danger to the victim vehicle itself, but also to potential passengers sitting inside the vehicle, who may not notice the route changes. In this paper, we design and implement the first adversarial framework, called JackZebra, which performs route-level hijacking of a vision-based end-to-end driving stack using a physically plausible attacker vehicle with a reconfigurable display and a camera sensor mounted on the rear. The central challenge is temporal persistence: adversarial influence must remain effective in changing viewpoints, lighting, weather, traffic, and the victim's continual replanning -- without triggering conspicuous failures. Our key insight is to treat route hijacking as a closed-loop control problem and to convert adversarial patches into steering primitives that can be selected online via an interactive adjustment loop based on observed victim behavior using the rear camera. Our evaluations in both simulated and real-world scenarios show that JackZebra can successfully hijack victim vehicles to deviate from original routes and stop at places designated by the adversary with a high success rate.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial scenarios and safety testing, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 23 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2026.
Builds on
23 of 56 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 22
- 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
- 2024Bench2Drive: Towards Multi-Ability Benchmarking of Closed-Loop End-To-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 250
- 2022Trajectory-guided Control Prediction for End-to-end Autonomous Driving: A Simple yet Strong Baselinecited by 247
- 2021Enhanced Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 237
- 2020Blind Backdoors in Deep Learning Modelscited by 174
- 2025SimLingo: Vision-Only Closed-Loop Autonomous Driving with Language-Action Alignmentcited by 149
- 2020Graph Backdoorcited by 112
- 2018Local Gradients Smoothing: Defense against localized adversarial attackscited by 85
- 2021Segment and Complete: Defending Object Detectors against Adversarial Patch Attacks with Robust Patch Detectioncited by 67
- 2020Dirty Road Can Attack: Security of Deep Learning based Automated Lane Centering under Physical-World Attackcited by 64
- 2022You Can't See Me: Physical Removal Attacks on LiDAR-based Autonomous Vehicles Driving Frameworkscited by 32
- 2024An LLM-Assisted Easy-to-Trigger Backdoor Attack on Code Completion Models: Injecting Disguised Vulnerabilities against Strong Detectioncited by 32
10 more
- 2023ASSET: Robust Backdoor Data Detection Across a Multiplicity of Deep Learning Paradigmscited by 29
- 2022Fooling the Eyes of Autonomous Vehicles: Robust Physical Adversarial Examples Against Traffic Sign Recognition Systemscited by 27
- 2021Security Analysis of Camera-LiDAR Fusion Against Black-Box Attacks on Autonomous Vehiclescited by 26
- 2023Sneaky Spikes: Uncovering Stealthy Backdoor Attacks in Spiking Neural Networks with Neuromorphic Datacited by 18
- 2022Rolling Colors: Adversarial Laser Exploits against Traffic Light Recognitioncited by 15
- 2022Too Afraid to Drive: Systematic Discovery of Semantic DoS Vulnerability in Autonomous Driving Planning under Physical-World Attackscited by 11
- 2021DoubleStar: Long-Range Attack Towards Depth Estimation based Obstacle Avoidance in Autonomous Systemscited by 10
- 2025DeBackdoor: A Deductive Framework for Detecting Backdoor Attacks on Deep Models with Limited Datacited by 5
- 2022CANflict: Exploiting Peripheral Conflicts for Data-Link Layer Attacks on Automotive Networkscited by 2
- 2023Kidnapping Deep Learning-based Multirotors using Optimized Flying Adversarial Patchescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026AD2: Analysis and Detection of Adversarial Threats in Visual Perception for End-to-End Autonomous Driving Systems
- 2021Evaluating Adversarial Attacks on Driving Safety in Vision-Based Autonomous Vehicles
- 2024Training Adversarial yet Safe Agent to Characterize Safety Performance of Highly Automated Vehicles
- 2024Attack End-to-End Autonomous Driving through Module-Wise Noise
- 2026Comparative Analysis of Patch Attack on VLM-Based Autonomous Driving Architectures
- 2026Learning Responsibility-Attributed Adversarial Scenarios for Testing Autonomous Vehicles
- 2025Revisiting Adversarial Perception Attacks and Defense Methods on Autonomous Driving Systems
- 2021Learning Image Attacks toward Vision Guided Autonomous Vehicles