Reinforcement Learning with Promising Tokens for Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a key paradigm for aligning and optimizing large language models (LLMs). Standard approaches treat the LLM as the policy and apply RL directly over the full vocabulary space. However, this formulation includes the massive tail of contextually irrelevant tokens in the action space, which could distract the policy from focusing on decision-making among the truly reasonable tokens. In this work, we verify that valid reasoning paths could inherently concentrate within a low-rank subspace. Based on this insight, we introduce Reinforcement Learning with Promising Tokens (RLPT), a framework that mitigates the action space issue by decoupling strategic decision-making from token generation. Specifically, RLPT leverages the semantic priors of the base model to identify a dynamic set of promising tokens and constrains policy optimization exclusively to this refined subset via masking. Theoretical analysis and empirical results demonstrate that RLPT effectively reduces gradient variance, stabilizes the training process, and improves sample efficiency. Experiment results on math, coding, and telecom reasoning show that RLPT outperforms standard RL baselines and integrates effectively across various model sizes (4B and 8B) and RL algorithms (GRPO and DAPO).
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2026.
Builds on
22 of 34 references.
References · 22
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
10 more
- 2018Data-Efficient Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 436
- 2024ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuningcited by 236
- 2020A Closer Look at Invalid Action Masking in Policy Gradient Algorithmscited by 160
- 2024Turning Up the Heat: Min-p Sampling for Creative and Coherent LLM Outputscited by 148
- 2024Rule Based Rewards for Language Model Safetycited by 106
- 2023Language Model Self-improvement by Reinforcement Learning Contemplationcited by 75
- 2025MindSpeed RL: Distributed Dataflow for Scalable and Efficient RL Training on Ascend NPU Clustercited by 9
- 2024Knowledgeable Agents by Offline Reinforcement Learning from Large Language Model Rolloutscited by 6
- 2021Reinforcement Learning With Sparse-Executing Actions via Sparsity Regularizationcited by 2
- 2026EDCO: Dynamic Curriculum Orchestration for Domain-specific Large Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Diversity or Precision? A Deep Dive into Next Token Prediction
- 2025On Predictability of Reinforcement Learning Dynamics for Large Language Models
- 2026Rethinking RL for LLM Reasoning: It's Sparse Policy Selection, Not Capability Learning
- 2025Reinforcement Learning on Pre-Training Data
- 2026Which Tokens Matter? Adaptive Token Selection for RLVR with the Relative Surprisal Index
- 2024Entropy-Regularized Token-Level Policy Optimization for Language Agent Reinforcement
- 2025Token-Efficient RL for LLM Reasoning
- 2025RL in Name Only? Analyzing the Structural Assumptions in RL post-training for LLMs